IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i3p1242-d1849107.html

Organizational Capabilities and Sustainable Performance in Construction Projects: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Yonghong Chen

    (Faculty of Civil Engineering and Mechanics, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650500, China)

  • Yao Lu

    (Faculty of Civil Engineering and Mechanics, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650500, China)

  • Wenyi Qiu

    (Faculty of Civil Engineering and Mechanics, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650500, China)

  • Mi Zhang

    (Faculty of Civil Engineering and Mechanics, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650500, China)

Abstract

In an era increasingly defined by the imperative for sustainable development, the construction sector faces significant challenges, including resource limitations, environmental pressures, and high uncertainty. Within this context, the organizational capabilities of construction projects are widely recognized as a critical endogenous driver, closely linked to sustainable performance outcomes. Yet, empirical research to date has produced inconsistent conclusions, and a systematic understanding of how distinct dimensions of capability influence sustainability remains surprisingly fragmented. To address this gap, we employ a meta-analysis to synthesize 11,881 independent samples from 64 quantitative empirical studies. We systematically examined the overall relationship between organizational capability in construction projects and sustainable performance. It further compares the differential effects of project capabilities and dynamic capabilities across economic, social, and environmental performance. Additionally, the study investigated the moderating effects of key contextual and methodological factors. Our analysis yielded several important findings: (1) A significant, moderately positive correlation exists between organizational capability in construction projects and sustainable performance. (2) Project capability exerts a stronger association with economic and social performance, whereas dynamic capability demonstrates a more pronounced effect on environmental performance. This underscored distinct pathways through which different capability dimensions operate. (3) Moderation analysis revealed that the relationship between organizational capability and sustainable performance is stronger in emerging economies and collectivist cultural contexts. Methodologically, structural equation modeling tended to produce larger effect sizes compared to regression analysis. Although no significant moderation effect emerges across research time points, post-2015 studies generally showed slightly stronger effects. The findings enrich the application of the Resource-Based View and Dynamic Capability Theory within construction project contexts, emphasizing the multidimensional nature of organizational capabilities and their differentiated roles across triple-bottom-line performance. Consequently, this research offers valuable pathways for capability development and a strategic foundation for enhancing managerial practice in construction project management.

Suggested Citation

  • Yonghong Chen & Yao Lu & Wenyi Qiu & Mi Zhang, 2026. "Organizational Capabilities and Sustainable Performance in Construction Projects: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-23, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:3:p:1242-:d:1849107
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/3/1242/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/3/1242/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:3:p:1242-:d:1849107. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.