IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i3p1230-d1848807.html

Towards a Circular Economy Scheme in Jordan: Environmental and Socio-Economic Appraisal of Municipal Solid Waste Recycling Pathways

Author

Listed:
  • Husam A. Abu Hajar

    (Civil Engineering Department, School of Engineering, The University of Jordan, Amman 11942, Jordan)

  • Zahra H. Mustafa

    (Civil Engineering Department, School of Engineering, The University of Jordan, Amman 11942, Jordan)

  • Ayham A. AlAmaren

    (Civil Engineering Department, School of Engineering, The University of Jordan, Amman 11942, Jordan)

  • Abrar A. Jawabreh

    (Civil Engineering Department, School of Engineering, The University of Jordan, Amman 11942, Jordan)

  • Bahieh A. Slehat

    (Civil Engineering Department, School of Engineering, The University of Jordan, Amman 11942, Jordan)

  • Bayan O. Alkhawaldeh

    (Civil Engineering Department, School of Engineering, The University of Jordan, Amman 11942, Jordan)

  • Rahaf A. Alrahamneh

    (Civil Engineering Department, School of Engineering, The University of Jordan, Amman 11942, Jordan)

Abstract

The transition toward a circular economy (CE) is progressively recognized as a strategic pathway to reconcile economic growth with environmental sustainability. Municipal solid waste management in Jordan remains mostly linear, with over 90% of the generated waste disposed of in landfills and open dumpsites. This study critically examines the prospects of adopting CE principles in Jordan’s waste sector by evaluating current practices, policy frameworks, and potential recycling pathways. A mixed-methods approach was adopted, combining quantitative modeling with qualitative insights from stakeholders and public surveys. Three recycling scenarios were assessed against the baseline scenario: 25%, 50%, and 75% waste recovery by 2034. The U.S. EPA WARM model was used to estimate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and energy savings. It was inferred that the net avoided emissions (against the baseline) for Scenarios 1, 2, and 3 are 14.5%, 29.0%, and 44%, respectively, with paper/cardboard contributing most to avoided emissions. Nonetheless, only Scenarios 2 and 3 were deemed environmentally sustainable, as their projected net GHG emissions for 2034 were lower than those recorded in the base year. Socio-economic analysis identified the major barriers as limited public awareness and participation, infrastructural gaps, and financial and institutional constraints. The analysis further reveals that despite the relatively high capital and operating costs associated with advancing toward CE in waste management, the long-term environmental and socio-economic gains are expected to outweigh the associated costs, particularly in terms of avoided GHG emissions and reduced landfill dependency.

Suggested Citation

  • Husam A. Abu Hajar & Zahra H. Mustafa & Ayham A. AlAmaren & Abrar A. Jawabreh & Bahieh A. Slehat & Bayan O. Alkhawaldeh & Rahaf A. Alrahamneh, 2026. "Towards a Circular Economy Scheme in Jordan: Environmental and Socio-Economic Appraisal of Municipal Solid Waste Recycling Pathways," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-18, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:3:p:1230-:d:1848807
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/3/1230/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/3/1230/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:3:p:1230-:d:1848807. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.