Author
Listed:
- Giancarlo D’Angelo
(Department of Applied Science and Technology, Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi 24, 10129 Torino, Italy)
- Ganapathy Pattukandan Ganapathy
(Centre for Disaster Mitigation and Management, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore 632014, India)
- Subramaniam Shanthakumar
(Centre for Clean Environment, Vellore Institute of Technology (VIT), Vellore 632014, India)
- Fulvia Chiampo
(Department of Applied Science and Technology, Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi 24, 10129 Torino, Italy)
Abstract
Leather has been a commodity since ancient times, when primitive men hunted animals for food and used their hides and skins for clothes and tents. Nowadays, the tanning process is highly industrialised. The chromium tanning is the most widely used because it produces high-quality leather despite its serious environmental impacts. The purpose of this study is to analyse the environmental impact of an Indian company that carries out post-tanning operations on bovine hides, that is to say, from the so-called wet-blue to finished crust. To do this, the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is implemented using the primary data provided by the company. The analysis has been carried out by the OpenLCA software, and 16 environmental impact categories have been evaluated. The results show that the processes for producing fuel (coal and diesel oil) and chromium(III) salts are the main contributors to the environmental impact for nearly all categories. These types of impacts are upstream, whereas the operations carried out by the company have impacts on the climate change category, due to the use of fossil fuels in the production process. Therefore, the direct action that the company could take is the substitution of fuel to produce energy with a renewable energy source. The comparison of these results with the whole tanning process present in the software confirms the limited impact of the post-tanning. At last, the results also evidence the methodological value of Life Cycle Assessment, which can be used to show what can be improved in one installation to reduce its environmental impact.
Suggested Citation
Giancarlo D’Angelo & Ganapathy Pattukandan Ganapathy & Subramaniam Shanthakumar & Fulvia Chiampo, 2026.
"Environmental Impacts and Sustainability of Tannery: A Case Study,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-17, January.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:3:p:1218-:d:1848588
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:3:p:1218-:d:1848588. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.