IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i3p1216-d1848601.html

Corporate ESG Disclosure and New Quality Productivity: Evidence from Corporate Reputation Mechanisms

Author

Listed:
  • Jia Song

    (Business School, Nanjing University, Nanjing 211106, China)

  • Decai Yang

    (Business School, Nanjing University, Nanjing 211106, China)

Abstract

The ESG concept encompasses corporate values of sustainable growth and green development, aligning with the contemporary essence of new quality productivity. This study examines the relationship between corporate ESG disclosure and new quality productivity from a reputation perspective, revealing that ESG disclosure promotes both short- and long-term new quality productivity. It facilitates these enhancements through the signal transmission effect and spillover effects of corporate reputation. Furthermore, regional social trust and environmental regulations amplify the enhancement effect of corporate ESG disclosure on new quality productivity, exerting a stronger moderation influence in the long term. Conversely, ESG rating divergence suppresses this enhancement effect, with a more pronounced inhibitory impact in the long term. Additional analysis indicates that media sentiment coverage influences this promotional effect. Positive media sentiment can enhance the positive impact of corporate ESG disclosure, while negative media sentiment can weaken this impact. The findings indicate that reputation influences the effect of ESG disclosure on new quality productivity. These conclusions provide valuable insights into corporate ESG management and the formulation of regulatory ESG policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Jia Song & Decai Yang, 2026. "Corporate ESG Disclosure and New Quality Productivity: Evidence from Corporate Reputation Mechanisms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-27, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:3:p:1216-:d:1848601
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/3/1216/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/3/1216/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:3:p:1216-:d:1848601. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.