Author
Listed:
- Vladislav Poulek
(Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences, 16500 Prague, Czech Republic)
- Vaclav Beranek
(Faculty of Engineering, Czech University of Life Sciences, 16500 Prague, Czech Republic)
- Tomas Finsterle
(Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, 16000 Prague, Czech Republic)
- Martin Kozelka
(Faculty of Engineering, Czech University of Life Sciences, 16500 Prague, Czech Republic)
Abstract
The ground impedance (insulation resistance R isol ) of photovoltaic (PV) modules is usually measured only in the dry state, even though arrays frequently operate under dew-wet or rain-wet conditions, when leakage paths can change. We measured dry insulation resistance R dry and IEC 61215 MQT 15 wet leakage resistance R wet for N = 37 field-aged crystalline-silicon modules from utility-scale plants and related the results to the IEC 40 MΩ·m 2 criterion (R wet × A ≥ 40). The measurements used 1000 V DC and a 2 min dwell; R wet was obtained in a salted bath with a solution resistivity < 3500 Ω·cm. The median R dry was 42.4 GΩ, whereas the median R wet was 462.5 MΩ, resulting in a median R dry /R wet ratio of ~110×. Three modules (8.1%) failed the 40 MΩ·m 2 limit already in the dry state, whereas eight modules (21.6%) failed under IEC-wet conditions; five were dry-pass/wet-fail cases that would have passed dry screening. For a representative area A = 1.8 m 2 , a practical conservative dry triage threshold of approximately 55.5 GΩ identifies modules needing IEC-wet verification rather than serving as a stand-alone limit. Overall, combining dry and IEC-wet measurements improves safety and supports sustainability through resource-efficient repowering/revamping and end-of-life decisions in large PV fleets, particularly in hot climates.
Suggested Citation
Vladislav Poulek & Vaclav Beranek & Tomas Finsterle & Martin Kozelka, 2026.
"Dry Pass, Wet Fail: Ground Impedance Testing of Field-Aged PV Modules—Implications for Repowering/Revamping Within 5–10 Years and for Environmental Sustainability,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-17, January.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:3:p:1212-:d:1848496
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:3:p:1212-:d:1848496. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.