IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i3p1201-d1848060.html

Car-Following-Truck Risk Identification and Its Influencing Factors Under Truck Occlusion on Mountainous Two-Lane Roads

Author

Listed:
  • Taiwu Yu

    (Natural Resources Bureau of Suijiang County, Zhaotong 657700, China)

  • Kairui Pu

    (Faculty of Transportation Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650500, China)

  • Wenwen Qin

    (Faculty of Transportation Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650500, China)

  • Jie Chen

    (Yunnan Infrastructure Investment Co., Ltd., Kunming 650000, China)

Abstract

Unstable car-following behavior under truck-induced visual occlusion on mountainous two-lane roads significantly increases rear-end crash risk. However, compared with studies focusing on overtaking or curve risk prediction, the car-following-truck (CFT) risk and its influencing factors have received limited attention. Therefore, this study used unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) to collect high-resolution trajectory data of CFT scenarios on both straight and curved segments under truck-induced occlusion. First, the CFT risk was quantified based on an anticipated collision time (ACT) indicator, a two-dimensional surrogate safety measure that accounts for vehicle acceleration variations. Then, extreme value theory (EVT) was applied to calibrate alignment-specific risk thresholds. Finally, an XGBoost-based risk identification model was developed using vehicle dynamics-related features, and feature importance analysis combined with partial dependence interpretability was conducted to obtain key influencing factors. The results show that the calibrated ACT thresholds are approximately 3.838 s for straight segments and 4.385 s for curved segments, providing a reliable basis for risk classification. In addition, the XGBoost-based risk identification achieved accuracies of 90.63% and 95.87% for straight and curved segments, respectively. Further analysis indicates that CFT distance was the contributing factor. Moreover, risk increases markedly within a 10–20 m range on straight segments, while it rises rapidly once spacing falls below about 10 m on curved segments. Speed and acceleration differences exhibited stronger amplifying effects under short-spacing conditions. These findings provide a micro-behavioral basis for safety management and intelligent driving applications on mountainous roads with high truck mixing rates, supporting safer and more sustainable traffic operations.

Suggested Citation

  • Taiwu Yu & Kairui Pu & Wenwen Qin & Jie Chen, 2026. "Car-Following-Truck Risk Identification and Its Influencing Factors Under Truck Occlusion on Mountainous Two-Lane Roads," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-26, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:3:p:1201-:d:1848060
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/3/1201/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/3/1201/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:3:p:1201-:d:1848060. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.