IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i3p1196-d1848004.html

Assessing the Suitability of Digestate and Compost as Organic Fertilizers: A Comparison of Different Biological Stability Indices for Sustainable Development in Agriculture

Author

Listed:
  • Isabella Pecorini

    (Department of Energy, Systems, Territory and Construction Engineering, University of Pisa, Largo Lucio Lazzarino, 56122 Pisa, Italy)

  • Francesco Pasciucco

    (Department of Energy, Systems, Territory and Construction Engineering, University of Pisa, Largo Lucio Lazzarino, 56122 Pisa, Italy)

  • Roberta Palmieri

    (Department of Engineering, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Via Roma 29, 80031 Aversa, Italy
    Department of Environmental, Biological and Pharmaceutical Sciences and Technologies, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Via Vivaldi 43, 81100 Caserta, Italy)

  • Antonio Panico

    (Department of Engineering, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Via Roma 29, 80031 Aversa, Italy)

Abstract

Nowadays, biowaste valorization is a key point in the circular economy. Digestate and compost from organic waste treatment can be used as nutrient-rich fertilizers. In Europe, the use of biowaste-derived fertilizers is promoted by the European Fertilizer Regulation (EU) 2019/1009, which requires verification of their biological stability through regulated indices; however, it is not clear whether the proposed indices and threshold values indicate the same level of stability and what correlations there are between them. This study compared four biological stability indices, namely Oxygen Uptake Rate (OUR), Self-Heating (SH), Residual Biogas Potential (RBP), and Dynamic Respirometric Index (DRI), which were tested on 50 samples of compost and digestate. Overall, the results revealed that most of the compost and digestate samples were quite far from European standards. On the contrary, the RBP test seemed to be less stringent than the other indices, since a much larger number of samples was closer to or in compliance with the established threshold. Data analysis using Pearson’s coefficients showed a strong linear correlation between the indices. Nevertheless, the linear regression predictive model based on experimental data demonstrated that the indices could not represent the same level of stability, providing poor consistency and variability in the predicted values and established threshold. In particular, the DRI test appeared to be more severe than the other aerobic indices. This work could provide valuable support in improving evaluation criteria and promoting a sustainable use of compost and digestate as organic fertilizers from a circular economy perspective.

Suggested Citation

  • Isabella Pecorini & Francesco Pasciucco & Roberta Palmieri & Antonio Panico, 2026. "Assessing the Suitability of Digestate and Compost as Organic Fertilizers: A Comparison of Different Biological Stability Indices for Sustainable Development in Agriculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-23, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:3:p:1196-:d:1848004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/3/1196/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/3/1196/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:3:p:1196-:d:1848004. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.