Author
Listed:
- Hang Yang
(Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Ecological Restoration in Shaanbei Mining Area, Yulin University, Yulin 719000, China)
- Longfei Kang
(Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Ecological Restoration in Shaanbei Mining Area, Yulin University, Yulin 719000, China)
- Qing Liu
(Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Ecological Restoration in Shaanbei Mining Area, Yulin University, Yulin 719000, China)
- Qiang Li
(Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Ecological Restoration in Shaanbei Mining Area, Yulin University, Yulin 719000, China)
- Feng Ai
(State Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland Farming on the Loess Plateau, Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Ministry of Water Resources and Chinese Academy of Sciences, Yangling, Xianyang 712100, China)
- Kaiyu Zhang
(Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Ecological Restoration in Shaanbei Mining Area, Yulin University, Yulin 719000, China)
- Xinzhao Zhao
(Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Ecological Restoration in Shaanbei Mining Area, Yulin University, Yulin 719000, China)
- Kailang Ding
(Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Ecological Restoration in Shaanbei Mining Area, Yulin University, Yulin 719000, China)
Abstract
Soil salinization remains a critical constraint on global land sustainability, severely limiting agricultural output and ecosystem resilience. To address this issue, a field trial was implemented to investigate the interactive benefits of vermicompost (VC) and a novel soil conditioner derived from coal gasification slag-based soil conditioner (CGSS) in mitigating saline–alkali stress. The perennial forage grass Leymus chinensis , valued for its ecological robustness and economic potential under adverse soil conditions, served as the test species. Five treatments were established: CK (unamended), T1 (CGSS alone), T2 (VC alone), T3 (CGSS:VC = 1:1), T4 (CGSS:VC = 1:2), and T5 (CGSS:VC = 2:1). Study results indicate that the combined application of CGSS and VC outperformed individual amendments, with the T4 treatment demonstrating the most effective results. Compared to CK, T4 reduced soil electrical conductivity (EC) by 12.00% and pH by 5.17% ( p < 0.05), while markedly enhancing key fertility indicators—including soil organic matter and the availability of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium. Thus, these improvements translated into superior growth of L. chinensis , reflected in significantly greater dry biomass, expanded leaf area, and increased plant height. Additionally, the T4 treatment increased soil microbial richness (Chao1 index) by 21.5% and elevated the relative abundance of the Acidobacteria functional group by 16.9% ( p < 0.05). Hence, T4 treatment (CGSS: 15,000 kg·ha −1 ; VC: 30,000 kg·ha −1 ) was identified as the optimal remediation strategy through a fuzzy comprehensive evaluation that integrated multiple soil and plant indicators. From an economic perspective, the T4 treatment (corresponding to a VC-CGSS application ratio of 2: 1) exhibits a lower cost compared to other similar soil conditioners and organic fertilizer combinations for saline–alkali soil remediation. This study not only offers a practical and economically viable approach for reclaiming degraded saline–alkali soils but also advances the circular utilization of coal-based solid waste. Furthermore, it deepens our understanding of how integrated soil amendments modulate the soil–microbe–plant nexus under abiotic stress.
Suggested Citation
Hang Yang & Longfei Kang & Qing Liu & Qiang Li & Feng Ai & Kaiyu Zhang & Xinzhao Zhao & Kailang Ding, 2026.
"Synergistic Effects of Coal Gasification Slag-Based Soil Conditioner and Vermicompost on Soil–Microbe–Plant Systems Under Saline–Alkali Stress,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-18, January.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:3:p:1180-:d:1847634
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:3:p:1180-:d:1847634. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.