IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i3p1167-d1847422.html

A Scenario-Robust Intuitionistic Fuzzy AHP–TOPSIS Model for Sustainable Healthcare Waste Treatment Selection: Evidence from Türkiye

Author

Listed:
  • Pınar Özkurt

    (Department of Management Information Systems, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Tarsus University, 33400 Tarsus, Mersin, Türkiye)

Abstract

Selecting a sustainable healthcare waste treatment method is a complex multi-criteria problem influenced by environmental, economic, social and technological factors. This study addresses key gaps in the literature by proposing an intuitionistic fuzzy AHP–TOPSIS framework that explicitly models cognitive uncertainty and expert hesitation, while demonstrating its application through a real-world case study in Adana, Türkiye. In contrast to prior studies utilizing fewer criteria, our framework evaluates four treatment alternatives—incineration, steam sterilization, microwave, and landfill—across 17 comprehensive criteria that directly integrate circular economy principles such as resource recovery and energy efficiency. The results indicate that steam sterilization is the most sustainable option, demonstrating superior performance across environmental, economic, social, and technological dimensions. A 15-scenario sensitivity analysis ensures ranking resilience across varying decision contexts. Furthermore, a systematic comparative analysis highlights the methodological advantages of the proposed framework in terms of analytical granularity and robustness compared to existing models. The study also offers step-by-step operational guidance, creating a transparent and policy-responsive decision-support tool for healthcare waste management authorities to advance sustainable practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Pınar Özkurt, 2026. "A Scenario-Robust Intuitionistic Fuzzy AHP–TOPSIS Model for Sustainable Healthcare Waste Treatment Selection: Evidence from Türkiye," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-25, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:3:p:1167-:d:1847422
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/3/1167/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/3/1167/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:3:p:1167-:d:1847422. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.