Author
Listed:
- Xiaopeng Shen
(School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Suzhou University of Science and Technology, Suzhou 215129, China
These authors contributed equally to this work.)
- Fei Gao
(School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Suzhou University of Science and Technology, Suzhou 215129, China
Institute of Nature and Ecology, Heilongjiang Academy of Science, Harbin 150040, China
These authors contributed equally to this work.)
- Xing Zhang
(School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Suzhou University of Science and Technology, Suzhou 215129, China
Institute of Nature and Ecology, Heilongjiang Academy of Science, Harbin 150040, China)
- Daoguang Si
(School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Suzhou University of Science and Technology, Suzhou 215129, China
Institute of Nature and Ecology, Heilongjiang Academy of Science, Harbin 150040, China)
- Jiayi Tang
(Psychology and Health Counseling Center, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China)
Abstract
Cultural ecosystem services (CESs) represent a critical link between ecosystems and human well-being and constitute a core foundation for regional sustainable development. The balance between CES supply and demand directly affects the coordination efficiency between ecological conservation and socio-economic development, making it a key prerequisite for ecosystem management, conservation planning, and policy formulation. This study focuses on the circum-Taihu region and integrates multi-source data to assess public perceived demand and spatial supply capacity of CESs. Supply–demand matching relationships are examined across three dimensions, namely, scenic beauty, cultural heritage, and recreation, through the construction of a region-specific CES quantitative indicator system. The impacts of multiple environmental factors on CES supply–demand dynamics are further explored to provide scientific support for coordinated ecological, cultural, and economic sustainability at the regional scale. The findings demonstrate the following: (1) the proposed methodology effectively quantifies CES perception and supply capacity in the circum-Taihu region. Scenic beauty exhibits the highest perception levels, whereas cultural heritage and recreation show lower perception. Cultural heritage displays the strongest supply capacity, whereas scenic beauty and recreation exhibit weaker supply. (2) Significant spatial imbalances exist between CES perception levels and supply capacity across the circum-Taihu region. Areas exhibiting mismatches constitute the largest proportion for cultural heritage CESs, followed by scenic beauty, with recreation displaying the smallest amounts of imbalance. (3) Environmental drivers exert differentiated effects on CES supply–demand relationships. Slope, road network density, and elevation have significant positive effects, whereas the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), distance to water bodies, and distance to roads exhibit significant negative effects. Distance to roads imposes the strongest inhibitory influence on CES perception, whereas elevation emerges as the most influential driver of public perceived CES levels.
Suggested Citation
Xiaopeng Shen & Fei Gao & Xing Zhang & Daoguang Si & Jiayi Tang, 2026.
"Spatial Coupling of Supply and Perceived Demand for Cultural Ecosystem Services in the Circum-Taihu Basin Using Multi-Source Data Fusion,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-17, January.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:3:p:1159-:d:1847189
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:3:p:1159-:d:1847189. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.