Author
Listed:
- Hakim Mohamed Berradia
(Department of Accounting, College of Business, Jouf University, Skaka 72388, Saudi Arabia)
Abstract
This study investigates the different mechanisms through which environmental disclosure and green accounting practices influence investment attractiveness in an emerging market context. Drawing on legitimacy theory and the resource-based view, we examine whether these environmental accountability mechanisms create value directly or through enhanced sustainability performance. Using survey data from 290 non-financial firms listed on the Saudi Stock Exchange, we employ partial least squares structural equation modeling to test a mediated-moderation model within the Saudi Vision 2030 framework. The results reveal differentiated value-creation pathways: environmental disclosure affects investment attractiveness indirectly through sustainable economic outcomes (full mediation; indirect effect β = 0.121, p < 0.001), while green accounting demonstrates both direct (β = 0.237, p < 0.001) and indirect effects (β = 0.091, p < 0.01), indicating partial mediation. Both practices are positively associated with sustainable economic outcomes (β_ED = 0.290, β_GA = 0.219, p < 0.001), which in turn are positively related to investment attractiveness (β = 0.416, p < 0.001). Unexpectedly, Vision 2030 alignment shows no significant moderating effect (β = 0.042, p = 0.498), suggesting that the sustainability–investment relationship is not significantly conditioned by perceived alignment with the national strategic framework in this sample. The model explains 25.7% of the variance in investment attractiveness and 20.0% of that in sustainable economic outcomes, indicating moderate explanatory power. These findings contribute to the environmental accounting literature by suggesting that internal management-oriented practices may be more closely associated with investment attractiveness than disclosure transparency alone. Overall, the results indicate that green accounting systems are associated with investment attractiveness, while environmental disclosure appears to require observable sustainability performance to be reflected in investment perceptions, offering measured implications for corporate strategy and regulatory policy in sustainability transitions.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:2:p:987-:d:1843282. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.