IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i2p952-d1842590.html

Water–Fertilizer Interactions: Optimizing Water-Saving and Stable Yield for Greenhouse Hami Melon in Xinjiang

Author

Listed:
  • Zhenliang Song

    (College of Hydraulic and Civil Engineering, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China)

  • Yahui Yan

    (College of Food Science and Pharmacology, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China
    Postdoctoral Station of Horticulture, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China)

  • Ming Hong

    (College of Hydraulic and Civil Engineering, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China)

  • Han Guo

    (College of Hydraulic and Civil Engineering, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China)

  • Guangning Wang

    (College of Hydraulic and Civil Engineering, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China)

  • Pengfei Xu

    (College of Hydraulic and Civil Engineering, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China)

  • Liang Ma

    (College of Hydraulic and Civil Engineering, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China)

Abstract

Addressing the challenges of low resource-use efficiency and supply–demand mismatch in Hami melon production, this study investigated the interactive effects of irrigation and fertilization to identify an optimal regime that balances yield, water conservation, and resource-use efficiency (i.e., water use efficiency and fertilizer partial factor productivity). A greenhouse experiment was conducted in Hami, Xinjiang, employing a two-factor design with five irrigation levels (W1–W5: 60–100% of full irrigation) and three fertilization levels (F1–F3: 80–100% of standard rate), replicated three times. Growth parameters, yield, water use efficiency (WUE), and partial factor productivity of fertilizer (PFP) were evaluated and comprehensively analyzed using the entropy-weighted TOPSIS method, regression analysis, and the NSGA-II multi-objective genetic algorithm. Results demonstrated that irrigation volume was the dominant factor influencing growth and yield. The W4F3 treatment (90% irrigation with 100% fertilization) achieved the optimal outcome, yielding 75.74 t ha −1 —a 9.71% increase over the control—while simultaneously enhancing WUE and PFP. Both the entropy-weighted TOPSIS evaluation (C = 0.998) and regression analysis (optimal irrigation level at w = 0.79, ~90% of full irrigation) identified W4F3 as superior. NSGA-II optimization further validated this, generating Pareto-optimal solutions highly consistent with the experimental optimum. The model-predicted optimal regime for greenhouse Hami melon in Xinjiang is an irrigation amount of 3276 m 3 ha −1 and a fertilizer application rate of 814.8 kg ha −1 . This regime facilitates a 10% reduction in irrigation water and a 5% reduction in fertilizer input without compromising yield, alongside significantly improved resource-use efficiencies.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhenliang Song & Yahui Yan & Ming Hong & Han Guo & Guangning Wang & Pengfei Xu & Liang Ma, 2026. "Water–Fertilizer Interactions: Optimizing Water-Saving and Stable Yield for Greenhouse Hami Melon in Xinjiang," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-20, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:2:p:952-:d:1842590
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/2/952/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/2/952/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:2:p:952-:d:1842590. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.