Author
Listed:
- Kai Lu
(School of Agricultural Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China)
- Weiguo Fu
(School of Agricultural Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China)
Abstract
This study optimizes fertilization schemes through the emergy analysis of different nutrient reduction treatments in maize cropping ecosystems in Xinjiang, thereby providing technical support for improving chemical fertilizer use efficiency and maintaining the stability of farmland ecosystems. The study was conducted in 2024 at Huaxing Farm in Changji Hui Autonomous Prefecture, Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region. The experiment used the local conventional nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization rates as the control treatment N0P0 (applying P 183 kg·hm −2 and N 246 kg·hm −2 ), with eight different N and P nutrient reduction treatments: N0P1 (10% reduction in P only), N0P2 (20% reduction in P only), N1P0 (10% reduction in N only), N2P0 (20% N reduction), N1P1 (10% N and P reduction), N1P2 (10% N and 20% P reduction), N2P1 (20% N and 10% P reduction), and N2P2 (20% N and P reduction). Each treatment was replicated three times. Based on biomass data of maize plant components under different fertilization treatments, emergy analysis of farmland ecosystems and integration of economic benefit indicators led to the optimization of an optimal fertilization scheme. Results indicate that the N0P1 treatment performed optimally: maize plant biomass reached 251.09 g, significantly higher than other treatments. The N0P1 treatment exhibited the highest energy output (3.23 × 10 16 sej·hm −2 ), the highest net energy yield ratio (EYR) of 1.45, and an energy sustainability index (ESI) of 3.34, representing a high level. It also delivered the highest economic benefit, with a net profit of 8571.95 CNY·hm −2 and a production–investment ratio of 1.71. In conclusion, the N0P1 treatment (10% reduction in phosphorus alone) demonstrated superior performance in biomass yield, energy utilization efficiency, ecological sustainability, and economic benefits, making it the optimal fertilization strategy for maize fields in this region.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:2:p:901-:d:1841516. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.