Author
Listed:
- Yongyan Yang
(Guizhou Liping Rocky Desertification Ecosystem Observation and Research Station, Guizhou Academy of Forestry, Guiyang 550000, China)
- Zhirong Feng
(Guizhou Liping Rocky Desertification Ecosystem Observation and Research Station, Guizhou Academy of Forestry, Guiyang 550000, China)
- Liang Qin
(Hezhang County Forestry Bureau, Bijie 553200, China)
- Hua Zhou
(Guizhou Liping Rocky Desertification Ecosystem Observation and Research Station, Guizhou Academy of Forestry, Guiyang 550000, China)
- Zhaohui Ren
(Guizhou Liping Rocky Desertification Ecosystem Observation and Research Station, Guizhou Academy of Forestry, Guiyang 550000, China)
Abstract
Monitoring stem sap flow is essential for understanding plant water-use strategies and eco-physiological processes in the ecologically fragile karst region. In the study, we continuously monitored four co-occurring species— Cryptomeria japonica var. sinensis (LS), Liquidambar formosana (FX), Camptotheca acuminata (XS), and Melia azedarach (KL)—using the thermal dissipation probe method in a karst farmland-to-forest restoration area. We analyzed diurnal and nocturnal sap flow variations across different growth periods and their responses to environmental factors at an hourly scale. The results showed (1) A “high daytime, low nighttime” sap flow pattern during the growing season for all species. (2) The proportion of nocturnal sap flow was significantly lower in the growing than in the non-growing season. (3) Daytime sap flow was primarily driven by photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) and vapor pressure deficit (VPD) during the growing season. In the non-growing season, daytime drivers were species-specific: relative humidity (RH, 39.39%) for LS; air temperature (Ta, 23.14%) for FX; PAR (33.03%) for XS; and soil moisture at a 10 cm depth (SM1, 25.2%) for KL. Nocturnal flow was governed by VPD and RH during the growing season versus soil moisture (SM1 and SM2) and RH in the non-growing season. These findings reveal interspecific differences in water-use strategies and provide a scientific basis for species selection and afforestation management in the karst ecological restoration of this research area.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:2:p:900-:d:1841481. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.