IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i2p888-d1841298.html

Evaluation of Stratified Prediction Methods for Spatial Distribution of Groundwater Contaminants (Benzene, Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons, and MTBE) at Abandoned Petrochemical Sites

Author

Listed:
  • Tianen Zhang

    (National Coal Mine Water Hazard Prevention Engineering Technology Research Center, China University of Mining and Technology, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Zheng Peng

    (Foreign Environmental Cooperation Center, Ministry of Ecology and Environment, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Fengying Xia

    (Baohang Environmental Remediation Co., Ltd., Beijing 101300, China)

  • Rifeng Kang

    (Beijing Beitou Eco-Environment Co., Ltd., Beijing 101117, China)

  • Yan Ma

    (Foreign Environmental Cooperation Center, Ministry of Ecology and Environment, Beijing 100083, China
    School of Chemical & Environmental Engineering, China University of Mining & Technology-Beijing, Beijing 100083, China)

Abstract

This study evaluates the accuracy of various Geographic Information System interpolation methods in predicting the stratified spatial distribution of organic pollutants (Benzene, Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons [TPH], and Methyl Tert-butyl Ether [MTBE]) in groundwater at a petrochemical-contaminated site. Given the limitations of traditional monitoring methods in predicting spatial distribution, this study focuses on the spatial computational prediction of volatile organic compound concentrations at a former petrochemical industrial site. Three interpolation methods—Inverse Distance Weighting (IDW), Radial Basis Function (RBF), and Ordinary Kriging (OK)—were applied and evaluated. Prediction accuracy was assessed using leave-one-out cross-validation, with performance quantified through key metrics: Root Mean Square Error, Coefficient of Determination, and Spearman’s Rank Correlation Coefficient. Results demonstrate significant variations in optimal prediction methods depending on pollutant type and depth stratum. For pollutants predominantly enriched in shallow and middle layers (Benzene, TPH), OK yielded the highest accuracy and stability. Conversely, for predictions of pollutants primarily concentrated in deeper layers, RBF achieved superior performance. IDW consistently underperformed across all strata and pollutants. All interpolation methods generally exhibited systematic overestimation of pollutant concentrations (mean cross-validation error > 0). Through a hierarchical evaluation of the accuracy and interpolation effectiveness of these methods, this study develops a more accurate modeling framework to describe the composite groundwater contamination patterns at petrochemical sites. This study systematically evaluates the spatial prediction accuracy of various non-aqueous phase liquid species under differing groundwater-table depths, identifies the most robust interpolation method, and thereby provides a benchmark for enhancing predictive fidelity in subsurface contaminant mapping.

Suggested Citation

  • Tianen Zhang & Zheng Peng & Fengying Xia & Rifeng Kang & Yan Ma, 2026. "Evaluation of Stratified Prediction Methods for Spatial Distribution of Groundwater Contaminants (Benzene, Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons, and MTBE) at Abandoned Petrochemical Sites," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-19, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:2:p:888-:d:1841298
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/2/888/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/2/888/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:2:p:888-:d:1841298. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.