IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i2p861-d1840619.html

A Framework for Sustainable Safety Culture Development Driven by Accident Causation Models: Evidence from the 24Model

Author

Listed:
  • Jinkun Zhao

    (School of Emergency Management and Safety Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology-Beijing, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Gui Fu

    (School of Emergency Management and Safety Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology-Beijing, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Zhirong Wu

    (School of Emergency Management and Safety Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology-Beijing, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Chenhui Yuan

    (School of Emergency Management and Safety Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology-Beijing, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Yuxuan Lu

    (School of Emergency Management and Safety Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology-Beijing, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Xuecai Xie

    (School of Engineering and Technology, China University of Geosciences (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China)

Abstract

A strong safety culture is essential for managing human factors in complex systems and constitutes a strategic resource for supporting the sustainable operation of organizations. However, conventional approaches remain limited by unclear conceptual boundaries and a lack of mechanisms linking safety culture with other organizational safety elements. To address these gaps, this study develops a sustainable safety culture construction method grounded in accident causation theory. Using the 24Model, we establish a concise “culture–system–ability–acts” framework that operationalizes the pathways through which safety culture shapes organizational safety performance. The method integrates four components: conceptual clarification of safety culture, quantitative assessment, factor identification based on the 24Model, and Bayesian network analysis to quantify interdependencies among culture, systems, ability, and acts. Empirical evidence from coal mining enterprises shows that safety culture influences safety performance indirectly by shaping system implementation quality, workers’ safety ability, and safety-related actions. Enhancing “demand of safety training” substantially mitigated system deficiencies related to ineffective implementation of procedures, failure in enforcing procedures, lack of qualifications, and insufficient supervision. Improved training also strengthened workers’ knowledge of accident cases, consequences of violations, and technical standards, thereby reducing competence-related gaps and promoting more consistent safety supervision behaviors. Sensitivity analysis highlights the importance of reinforcing “safety responsibilities of line departments” and improving the dissemination of safety knowledge, particularly accident case knowledge. Overall, the findings empirically validate the dynamic “culture–system–ability–acts” transmission mechanism of the 24Model and provide a structured, quantitative pathway for advancing sustainable safety culture development.

Suggested Citation

  • Jinkun Zhao & Gui Fu & Zhirong Wu & Chenhui Yuan & Yuxuan Lu & Xuecai Xie, 2026. "A Framework for Sustainable Safety Culture Development Driven by Accident Causation Models: Evidence from the 24Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-27, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:2:p:861-:d:1840619
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/2/861/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/2/861/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:2:p:861-:d:1840619. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.