Author
Listed:
- Muath Alyileili
(College of Engineering, University of Sharjah, Sharjah 27272, United Arab Emirates)
- Alex Opoku
(College of Engineering, University of Sharjah, Sharjah 27272, United Arab Emirates)
Abstract
As municipalities increasingly adopt artificial intelligence (AI) and generative AI (GenAI) to automate self-service technologies (SSTs), concerns related to fairness, transparency, accountability, and citizen trust have become central to sustainable public-sector governance. While existing studies emphasize either AI adoption or high-level ethical principles, limited empirical research explains how governance mechanisms translate into user-level outcomes in municipal services, particularly in the context of emerging GenAI capabilities. This study addresses this gap by examining how governance antecedents and system design attributes shape user satisfaction, trust, and perceived fairness in AI-enabled municipal SSTs in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). A mixed-methods research design was employed, combining a comparative analysis of international and UAE AI governance frameworks with semi-structured interviews ( n = 16) and a survey of municipal employees and service users ( n = 272). Qualitative findings reveal persistent concerns regarding data privacy, fairness, explainability, and the absence of standardized municipal-level accountability instruments. Quantitative analysis shows that perceived helpfulness significantly increases user satisfaction, while perceived fairness strongly predicts continued usage intentions. In contrast, system responsiveness exhibits a negative association with satisfaction, highlighting an expectation–performance gap in automated service delivery. Based on these findings, the study proposes a governance–implementation–outcomes model that operationalizes ethical AI principles into measurable governance and service-design mechanisms. Unlike prior adoption-focused or purely normative frameworks, this model empirically links governance instrumentation to citizen-centered outcomes, offering practical guidance for inclusive and sustainable AI and GenAI deployment in municipal self-service systems. The findings contribute to debates on sustainable digital governance by demonstrating how ethically governed AI systems can reinforce public trust, service equity, and long-term institutional resilience.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:2:p:849-:d:1840500. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.