IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i2p833-d1840212.html

Food Loss and Waste: A Review of Voluntary National and Voluntary Local Reviews of the United Nations

Author

Listed:
  • Emi Kameyama

    (College of Agriculture, Urban Sustainability and Environmental Sciences (CAUSES), University of the District of Columbia (UDC), 4200 Connecticut Ave NW, Washington, DC 20008, USA)

  • Sabine O’Hara

    (College of Agriculture, Urban Sustainability and Environmental Sciences (CAUSES), University of the District of Columbia (UDC), 4200 Connecticut Ave NW, Washington, DC 20008, USA)

  • Marian Stuiver

    (Data and Knowledge Hub for Healthy Urban Living, Utrecht University, Yalelaan 2, 3584 CM Utrecht, The Netherlands)

Abstract

Food loss and waste (FLW) presents a major global challenge and is explicitly referenced in the several of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), most notably in Target 12.3. The growing literature on FLW addresses a number of strategies to mitigate the problem; however, much of this work prioritizes technical solutions while studies focused on institutional solutions are less prevalent. Our study offers a systematic review of the FLW solutions discussed in the Voluntary National Reviews (VNRs) and Voluntary Local Reviews (VLRs) of the United Nations. We apply the Institutional Analysis and Development (IAD) framework pioneered by Nobel Laureate, Elinor Ostrom to our analysis of FLW solutions in the VNRs and VLRs to identify prevalent patterns as well as gaps evident in the reviews. We base our systematic review of FLW solutions on the VNRs and VLRs rather than on the peer-reviewed literature since government-reported FLW initiatives play a key role in guiding individual and collective actions toward achieving SDG 12.3. Using a systematic review approach, we identified 165 publicly available VNRs and 116 VLRs that report FLW activities and were published in English between 2016 and 2024. We then applied the IAD framework categories to the 281 identified Reports. Our findings suggest that nearly 60% of the Reports focused on technical solutions while 40% reported socially oriented solutions. The socially oriented solutions were primarily directed toward consumers and less frequently toward businesses and policymakers. These findings suggest that FLW solutions can be meaningfully advanced by placing more emphasis on the role of informal institutions in in advancing awareness and social engagement to address FLW. A stronger emphasis on social rather than technical solutions may also facilitate the development of local and regional partnerships that advance FLW objectives across all levels of governance, from local to global.

Suggested Citation

  • Emi Kameyama & Sabine O’Hara & Marian Stuiver, 2026. "Food Loss and Waste: A Review of Voluntary National and Voluntary Local Reviews of the United Nations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-25, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:2:p:833-:d:1840212
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/2/833/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/2/833/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:2:p:833-:d:1840212. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.