IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i2p800-d1839499.html

The Prevalence of Environmental Claims and Recycling Information on Alcohol Products

Author

Listed:
  • Laura Bathie

    (The George Institute for Global Health, Faculty of Medicine & Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney 2052, Australia)

  • Asad Yusoff

    (The George Institute for Global Health, Faculty of Medicine & Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney 2052, Australia)

  • Paula O’Brien

    (Melbourne Law School, The University of Melbourne, Parkville 3010, Australia)

  • Samadhi Hemachandra

    (The George Institute for Global Health, Faculty of Medicine & Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney 2052, Australia)

  • Bella Sträuli

    (The George Institute for Global Health, Faculty of Medicine & Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney 2052, Australia
    School of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University, Southport 4222, Australia)

  • Michelle I. Jongenelis

    (Melbourne Centre for Behaviour Change, The University of Melbourne, Parkville 3010, Australia)

  • Jacquie Bowden

    (National Centre for Education and Training on Addiction (NCETA), Flinders University, Bedford Park 5042, Australia)

  • Simone Pettigrew

    (The George Institute for Global Health, Faculty of Medicine & Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney 2052, Australia)

Abstract

Greenwashing by unvalidated environmental labelling is increasingly common and highly problematic due to the potential to mislead consumers. This is especially concerning for products that pose health risks, including alcohol. As environmental sustainability becomes more important to consumers, it is vital to assess changes in the use of potentially misleading claims over time. Among the first studies of its kind globally, this study aimed to (i) develop a typology of environmental claims displayed on alcohol products in Australia, (ii) examine the prevalence of these claims to establish baseline data for ongoing tracking, and (iii) assess the provision of recycling information. Four claim categories were identified: sustainability, planet friendly, bio-related and carbon-related. Claims featured on 8% of the 5982 sampled products, with considerable variation between alcohol categories. Sustainability claims were the most prevalent (5%). Recycling information appeared on 72% of products. The results suggest ambiguous environmental claims are present although not yet widespread. In contrast, recycling information is much more common although not universal. These findings highlight the need to consider restrictions on unsubstantiated environmental claims on alcohol products that can mislead consumers. Further, a nationally standardised mandatory recycling label should be introduced to assist consumers in reducing their environmental impacts.

Suggested Citation

  • Laura Bathie & Asad Yusoff & Paula O’Brien & Samadhi Hemachandra & Bella Sträuli & Michelle I. Jongenelis & Jacquie Bowden & Simone Pettigrew, 2026. "The Prevalence of Environmental Claims and Recycling Information on Alcohol Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-15, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:2:p:800-:d:1839499
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/2/800/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/2/800/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:2:p:800-:d:1839499. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.