Author
Listed:
- Yafei Li
(College of Air Traffic Management, Civil Aviation University of China, Tianjin 300300, China)
- Yuhan Wang
(College of Air Traffic Management, Civil Aviation University of China, Tianjin 300300, China)
Abstract
Despite growing research on sustainable aviation, multi-airport systems, and environmentally constrained capacity allocation, critical gaps persist. Existing studies often treat passenger choice, airline competition, and airport regulation in isolation, or evaluate environmental policies such as carbon taxation only as macro-level constraints. Consequently, the endogenous feedback among pricing, capacity reallocation, and regulatory intervention in shaping equilibrium outcomes within multi-airport systems remains underexplored, particularly within a unified dynamic framework that links low-carbon policies to operational decision-making. This study develops such a dynamic framework to support the sustainable transition of carbon-constrained multi-airport regions. Focusing on the Beijing–Tianjin multi-airport system and China’s “Dual Carbon” goals, we construct a three-layer iterative equilibrium game integrating passenger airport choice (modeled using a multinomial logit specification), airline capacity reallocation (formulated as an evolutionary game internalizing carbon taxes), and airport slot regulation (implemented through a multi-objective mechanism balancing economic revenue, hub connectivity, and environmental performance). An agent-based simulation of the Beijing/Tianjin–Nanchang route demonstrates robust convergence to a stable systemic equilibrium. Intensified competition reduces fares and improves accessibility, while capacity shifts from higher-cost Beijing airports to Tianjin Binhai Airport, whose market share rises from 10.6% to 34.0%. Airport utilization becomes more balanced, total airline profits increase slightly, and both total and per-passenger CO 2 emissions decline, indicating improved carbon efficiency despite demand growth. The results further identify a range of carbon-tax levels that jointly promote emission reduction and traffic rebalancing with limited profit loss.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:2:p:798-:d:1839465. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.