IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i2p794-d1839361.html

AI-Enhanced ESG Framework for Sustainability: A Multi-Sectoral Analysis Through an Explainable AI Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Imran Ahmad

    (Department of Computer Application, Integral University, Lucknow 226026, Uttar Pradesh, India)

  • Tasneem Ahmed

    (Department of Computer Application, Integral University, Lucknow 226026, Uttar Pradesh, India)

Abstract

The study introduces an AI-enhanced Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) framework that integrates explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) and bias-mitigation techniques to improve transparency and comparability of sustainability assessments across sectors. Addressing the persistent gap in standardized ESG evaluation methods, the framework combines gradient-boosting models (XGBoost) with SHAP-based explainability and a human-in-the-loop (HITL) validation layer. The approach is demonstrated using ESG indicators for 18 firms across three industries from the banking, aviation, and chemical sectors between 2021 and 2023. Results indicate an average 12.4% improvement in ESG-score consistency and a 9% reduction in inter-sector variance relative to baseline traditional ESG evaluations. Fairness metrics (Disparate-Impact Ratio = 0.81–0.86) provide preliminary evidence of improved alignment across sectors. The findings provide preliminary evidence that XAI-driven frameworks can enhance the trustworthiness and regulatory compliance of ESG analytics, particularly under the EU AI Act and Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD). The framework contributes to both research and practice by operationalizing explainability, fairness, and human oversight within ESG analytics, thereby supporting more reliable and comparable sustainability reporting.

Suggested Citation

  • Imran Ahmad & Tasneem Ahmed, 2026. "AI-Enhanced ESG Framework for Sustainability: A Multi-Sectoral Analysis Through an Explainable AI Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-21, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:2:p:794-:d:1839361
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/2/794/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/2/794/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:2:p:794-:d:1839361. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.