IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i2p785-d1839002.html

Sustainable AI-Driven Assessment in Higher Education: A Systematic Review of Fairness, Transparency, Pedagogical Innovation, and Governance

Author

Listed:
  • Maha Alfaleh

    (Department of Curriculums and Instructional Technologies, College of Humanities and social Sciences, Northern Border University, Arar 73222, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly utilized in higher-education assessment; however, existing research remains fragmented, with limited synthesis regarding the interplay of fairness, transparency, pedagogy, and governance. To address this gap, this systematic review analyzed 47 studies published between 2019 and 2025 across Western, Gulf, South Asian, and East Asian contexts, employing the PRISMA 2020 framework. Among these studies, 32 addressed fairness, 29 examined transparency, 34 explored pedagogical implications, and 22 investigated governance practices. Quantitative evidence demonstrated that AI achieved greater scoring consistency than human graders in over two-thirds of fairness-focused studies. Conversely, more than half of the transparency studies identified inadequate or partial disclosure of AI decision processes. Pedagogical studies indicated AI-enhanced feedback frequency and revision opportunities in approximately 70% of cases, although teacher mediation was necessary to mitigate over-reliance. Governance findings showed that fewer than one-third of institutions had established policies or audit mechanisms for ethical AI use. Based on these patterns, the review proposes a governance-anchored model that integrates fairness and transparency with pedagogical design, providing a coherent framework for institutions aiming to implement AI-based assessment responsibly and equitably.

Suggested Citation

  • Maha Alfaleh, 2026. "Sustainable AI-Driven Assessment in Higher Education: A Systematic Review of Fairness, Transparency, Pedagogical Innovation, and Governance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-16, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:2:p:785-:d:1839002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/2/785/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/2/785/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:2:p:785-:d:1839002. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.