IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i2p779-d1838820.html

Living Lab Assessment Method (LLAM): Towards a Methodology for Context-Sensitive Impact and Value Assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Ben Robaeyst

    (Imec-Mict-Ghent University, Department of Communication Sciences, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium)

  • Tom Van Nieuwenhove

    (Municipality of Ghent, 9000 Ghent, Belgium)

  • Dimitri Schuurman

    (Imec-Mict-Ghent University, Department of Industrial Systems Engineering and Product Design, Ghent University, 8500 Kortrijk, Belgium
    Design.Nexus Ghent University, Department of Industrial Systems Engineering and Product Design, Ghent University, 8500 Kortrijk, Belgium)

  • Jeroen Bourgonjon

    (iGent, Department of Information Technology, Ghent University, 9052 Ghent, Belgium)

  • Stephanie Van Hove

    (Municipality of Ghent, 9000 Ghent, Belgium)

  • Bastiaan Baccarne

    (Imec-Mict-Ghent University, Department of Industrial Systems Engineering and Product Design, Ghent University, 8500 Kortrijk, Belgium
    Design.Nexus Ghent University, Department of Industrial Systems Engineering and Product Design, Ghent University, 8500 Kortrijk, Belgium)

Abstract

This paper presents the Living Lab Assessment Method (LLAM), a context-sensitive framework for assessing impact and value creation in Living Labs (LLs). While LLs have become established instruments for Open and Urban Innovation, systematic and transferable approaches to evaluate their impact remain scarce and still show theoretical and practical barriers. This study proposes a new methodological approach that aims to address these challenges through the development of the LLAM, the Living Lab Assessment Method. This study reports a five-year iterative development process embedded in Ghent’s urban and social innovation ecosystem through the combination of three complementary methodological pillars: (1) co-creation and co-design with lead users, ensuring alignment with practitioner needs and real-world conditions; (2) multiple case study research, enabling iterative refinement across diverse Living Lab projects, and (3) participatory action research, integrating reflexive and iterative cycles of observation, implementation, and adjustment. The LLAM was empirically developed and validated across four use cases, each contributing to the method’s operational robustness and contextual adaptability. Results show that LLAM captures multi-level value creation, ranging from individual learning and network strengthening to systemic transformation, by linking participatory processes to outcomes across stakeholder, project, and ecosystem levels. The paper concludes that LLAM advances both theoretical understanding and practical evaluation of Living Labs by providing a structured, adaptable, and empirically grounded methodology for assessing their contribution to sustainable and inclusive urban innovation.

Suggested Citation

  • Ben Robaeyst & Tom Van Nieuwenhove & Dimitri Schuurman & Jeroen Bourgonjon & Stephanie Van Hove & Bastiaan Baccarne, 2026. "Living Lab Assessment Method (LLAM): Towards a Methodology for Context-Sensitive Impact and Value Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-27, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:2:p:779-:d:1838820
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/2/779/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/2/779/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:2:p:779-:d:1838820. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.