Author
Listed:
- Hanxiong Zhang
(The Institute of Hydrogeology and Environmental Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Shijiazhuang 050061, China
Technology Innovation Center of Geothermal & Hot Dry Rock Exploration and Development, Ministry of Natural Resources, Shijiazhuang 050800, China)
- Guiling Wang
(The Institute of Hydrogeology and Environmental Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Shijiazhuang 050061, China
Technology Innovation Center of Geothermal & Hot Dry Rock Exploration and Development, Ministry of Natural Resources, Shijiazhuang 050800, China)
- Wei Zhang
(The Institute of Hydrogeology and Environmental Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Shijiazhuang 050061, China
Technology Innovation Center of Geothermal & Hot Dry Rock Exploration and Development, Ministry of Natural Resources, Shijiazhuang 050800, China)
- Jiayi Zhao
(The Institute of Hydrogeology and Environmental Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Shijiazhuang 050061, China
Technology Innovation Center of Geothermal & Hot Dry Rock Exploration and Development, Ministry of Natural Resources, Shijiazhuang 050800, China)
Abstract
Geothermal fluids are the main carrier of hydrothermal geothermal resources. Identifying the differences in geothermal fluids in different types of reservoirs is a prerequisite and fundamental for the efficient development of geothermal resources and is of great significance for scientific research on geothermal resources. The North China Plain contains a typical carbonate thermal reservoir, and in this paper, the hydrochemical, isotopic, and redox characteristics of the geothermal fluids in sandstone and carbonate reservoirs are studied to obtain the differences in the geothermal fluids in the Rongcheng geothermal field in Xiong’an New Area. The results indicate that the geothermal fluids in the sandstone and carbonate reservoirs are mainly supplied by atmospheric rainfall, and the hydrochemical type is mainly Cl-Na type. By comparing and analyzing the stable isotope (O, H, C, S, and Sr) characteristics of the two types of geothermal fluids, it is found that the variation range of δ13C values for two types of sandstone thermal storage geothermal fluids was found to be −10.6‰~−12.8‰, while the variation range of δ 13 C values for carbonate thermal storage geothermal fluids was −3.3‰~−7.5‰. The 87 Sr/ 86 Sr ratio of sandstone thermal storage geothermal fluids was distributed between 0.708–0.718, and the 87 Sr/ 86 Sr ratio of carbonate thermal storage geothermal fluids was distributed between 0.708–0.713. The range of δ 34 S values for sandstone thermal storage geothermal fluids was +9.46‰~+10.5‰, and the range of δ 34 S values for carbonate thermal storage geothermal fluids was +24.84‰~+34.49‰. The two types of geothermal fluids have been subjected to varying degrees of oxidation-reduction, and their cycling and mixing characteristics are different. This has resulted in the formation of relatively oxidized geothermal fluids in the sandstone geothermal reservoir and relatively reduced geothermal fluids in the carbonate geothermal reservoir. In future development and utilization of geothermal resources, paying attention to the basic characteristics of the geothermal fluids in different reservoirs and identifying the differences in different geothermal fluids can further improve the efficiency of geothermal resource development and utilization.
Suggested Citation
Hanxiong Zhang & Guiling Wang & Wei Zhang & Jiayi Zhao, 2026.
"Differences in Geothermal Fluids in Sandstone and Carbonate Geothermal Reservoirs Based on Isotope Characteristics,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-28, January.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:2:p:766-:d:1838616
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:2:p:766-:d:1838616. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.