Author
Listed:
- Gloria Rodríguez-Loinaz
(Department of Mathematics, Experimental and Social Sciences Education, University of the Basque Country (UPV-EHU), 48980 Leioa, Spain)
Abstract
The contribution that the inclusion of CS in the curriculum can make to address SDG 4—Quality Education—which fosters convergence between Science Education and Education for Sustainable Development, essential for addressing the sustainability challenges currently facing humanity, has been widely recognized. This recognition is driving the inclusion of CS in formal education. However, to ensure that the use of CS in formal education contributes to this objective, a systematic and rigorous evaluation of its benefits in terms of participants’ learning outcomes (LO) is necessary. This study presents a systematic review of the published literature on CS projects implemented in compulsory education to examine whether students’ LO from participation in CS projects are evaluated, and if so, how this evaluation is performed. The results indicate a lack of systematic evaluation of LO from participating in CS projects. Moreover, although in 79% of cases, where some LO is evaluated, the evaluation reported positive results, in most of them, the results may have been influenced by the voluntary or mandatory nature of participation in the projects and the design of the evaluation itself. This may bias the results, leading to an over-optimistic view of the contribution of CS to SDG 4. In order to obtain solid evidence of the benefits, or lack thereof, for learners of participation in CS activities, which can guide the designers and educators in improving the CS projects to maximize their educational and sustainability impacts, some recommendations for future studies are presented.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:2:p:703-:d:1837241. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.