Author
Listed:
- Qiyuan Fan
(Department of Economics and Commerce Studies of North East Asia, Graduate School, Pai Chai University, Daejeon 35345, Republic of Korea)
- Jiajun Liu
(Department of Economics and Commerce Studies of North East Asia, Graduate School, Pai Chai University, Daejeon 35345, Republic of Korea)
- Wenwen Yu
(Department of Economics and Commerce Studies of North East Asia, Graduate School, Pai Chai University, Daejeon 35345, Republic of Korea)
Abstract
Despite growing interest in sustainable supply chains, we still know relatively little about how environmental requirements transmitted from key customers along the supply chain affect firms’ productivity and long-run economic sustainability. To address this gap, we introduce the notion of green supply chain pressure, downstream customers’ explicit green and low-carbon requirements on suppliers, and examine its implications for firm-level productivity and the mechanisms involved. Using a panel of Chinese A-share listed firms over 2014–2024, we construct a novel text-based index of green supply chain pressure by combining supply-chain relationship data with MD&A disclosures of major customers. Firm-level economic sustainability is measured by Levinsohn–Petrin total factor productivity, with Olley–Pakes estimates used for robustness. Fixed-effects regressions with industry–year and city–year controls show that stronger green supply chain pressure is associated with significantly higher productivity. Mediation analysis reveals that this effect operates partly through three resource-intensive adjustment channels: (i) a higher share of green patents in total innovation, (ii) capital deepening via a higher share of digital and intelligent fixed assets in total net fixed assets, and (iii) human capital upgrading through a larger proportion of highly educated employees. Interaction models further indicate that financing constraints critically condition these gains: the productivity effect of green supply chain pressure is stronger for firms with greater financial slack, and for high-tech, green-attribute and larger firms. Overall, the results highlight supply chain-based governance as a powerful complement to formal regulation for promoting long-run economic sustainability at the firm level.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:2:p:694-:d:1837040. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.