Author
Listed:
- Yanwei Wang
(Technical Centre for Soil, Agriculture and Rural Ecology and Environment, Ministry of Ecology and Environment, Beijing 100012, China)
- Haokun Yu
(Beijing District Heating Group Co., Ltd., Beijing 100028, China)
- Zongzhong Song
(Technical Centre for Soil, Agriculture and Rural Ecology and Environment, Ministry of Ecology and Environment, Beijing 100012, China)
- Jingrui Wang
(Technical Centre for Soil, Agriculture and Rural Ecology and Environment, Ministry of Ecology and Environment, Beijing 100012, China)
- Qingguo Song
(Aimoli (Hebei) Technology Co., Ltd., Shijiazhuang 050000, China)
Abstract
Groundwater vulnerability assessments serve as essential tools for sustainable groundwater management, particularly in regions with intensive anthropogenic activities. However, improving the objectivity and predictive reliability of vulnerability assessment frameworks remains a critical scientific challenge in groundwater science, especially for coastal aquifer systems characterized by strong heterogeneity and complex hydrogeological processes. The traditional DRASTIC model is a widely recognized method but suffers from subjectivity in assigning parameter ratings and weights, often leading to arbitrary and potentially inaccurate vulnerability maps. This limitation also restricts its applicability in areas with complex hydrogeological conditions. To enhance the accuracy and adaptability of the traditional DRASTIC model, a hybrid PSO-BP-DRASTIC framework was developed and applied it to a coastal city in China. Specifically, the model employs a backpropagation neural network (BP-NN) to optimize indicator weights and integrates the particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm to refine the initial weights and thresholds of the BP-NN. By introducing a data-driven and globally optimized weighting mechanism, the proposed framework effectively overcomes the inherent subjectivity of conventional empirical weighting schemes. Using ten-fold cross-validation and observed nitrate concentration data, the traditional DRASTIC, BP-DRASTIC, and PSO-BP-DRASTIC models were systematically validated and compared. The results demonstrate that (1) the PSO-BP-DRASTIC model achieved the highest classification accuracy on the test set, the highest stability across ten-fold cross-validation, and the strongest correlation with the nitrate concentrations; (2) the importance analysis identified the aquifer thickness and depth to the groundwater table as the most influential factors affecting groundwater vulnerability in Yantai; and (3) the spatial assessments revealed that high-vulnerability zones (7.85% of the total area) are primarily located in regions with intensive agricultural activities and high aquifer permeability. The hybrid PSO-BP-DRASTIC model effectively mitigates the subjectivity of the traditional DRASTIC method and the local optimum issues inherent in BP-NNs, significantly improving the assessment accuracy, stability, and objectivity. From a scientific perspective, this study demonstrates the feasibility of integrating swarm intelligence and neural learning into groundwater vulnerability assessment, providing a transferable and high-precision methodological paradigm for data-driven hydrogeological risk evaluation. This novel hybrid model provides a reliable scientific basis for the reasonable assessment of groundwater vulnerability. Moreover, these findings highlight the importance of integrating a hybrid optimization strategy into the traditional DRASTIC model to enhance its feasibility in coastal cities and other regions with complex hydrogeological conditions.
Suggested Citation
Yanwei Wang & Haokun Yu & Zongzhong Song & Jingrui Wang & Qingguo Song, 2026.
"A Novel Hybrid Model for Groundwater Vulnerability Assessment and Its Application in a Coastal City,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-16, January.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:2:p:674-:d:1836501
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:2:p:674-:d:1836501. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.