IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i2p648-d1835929.html

Ecological Restoration Zoning Based on the “Importance–Vulnerability” Framework for Ecosystem Services

Author

Listed:
  • Nan Li

    (School of Geography and Tourism, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an 710119, China)

  • Zezhou Hu

    (School of Geography and Tourism, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an 710119, China)

  • Miao Zhang

    (School of Geography and Tourism, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an 710119, China
    School of Environmental Studies, China University of Geosciencies, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Bei Wang

    (College of Geomatics, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710054, China)

  • Tian Zhang

    (School of Geography and Tourism, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an 710119, China)

Abstract

The Qinling–Bashan mountainous region and its surrounding areas in Shaanxi Province constitute a critical ecological security barrier and significant socio-economic zone within China, currently experiencing mounting ecological stress from both natural processes and anthropogenic activities. This study proposes an ecological restoration zoning framework built upon assessments of ecological vulnerability (EV) and ecosystem service value (ESV). The InVEST model was used to quantify major ecosystem services, while the Vulnerability Scoping Diagram (VSD) model evaluated ecological vulnerability. Both the ESV and EV layers were classified using the natural breaks method and aggregated at the township level to delineate restoration zones. Unlike previous studies relying on subjective judgment, this study constructs a standardized ‘vulnerability–service value’ decision matrix for the Qinling–Bashan region, providing a clear technical pathway for spatial restoration. Key findings include the following: (1) Spatial Vulnerability Pattern: The Qinling and Bashan mountain cores exhibit predominantly low vulnerability (potential and slight), while severe vulnerability is concentrated in the urbanizing Guanzhong Plain, emphasizing the need for urban ecological restoration. (2) Dominant Ecosystem Services: Carbon storage and net primary productivity (NPP) together account for 93% of the total ESV, highlighting the importance of forest conservation for national climate regulation. (3) Zoning Strategy: Four functional zones were defined, with the largest being the ecological conservation zone (44.8%), while a smaller ecological restoration zone (2.8%) in urban peripheries requires targeted intervention.

Suggested Citation

  • Nan Li & Zezhou Hu & Miao Zhang & Bei Wang & Tian Zhang, 2026. "Ecological Restoration Zoning Based on the “Importance–Vulnerability” Framework for Ecosystem Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-33, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:2:p:648-:d:1835929
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/2/648/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/2/648/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:2:p:648-:d:1835929. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.