IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i2p643-d1835877.html

Optimizing Forest Ecosystem Service Compensation Using Spillover Analysis: Evidence from Linyi’s Indicator Trading Policy, China

Author

Listed:
  • Hao Wang

    (School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Shandong University, Qingdao 266237, China
    Humanities Laboratory for the Theory and Mechanism Research on the Value Realizing of the Yellow River Ecosystem Products, Shandong University, Qingdao 266237, China)

  • Yaofa Ren

    (Modelling, Evidence and Policy Research Group, School of Natural and Environmental Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK)

  • Xiaoqing Chang

    (Humanities Laboratory for the Theory and Mechanism Research on the Value Realizing of the Yellow River Ecosystem Products, Shandong University, Qingdao 266237, China
    Institute of Humanities and Arts, Shandong University, Qingdao 266237, China)

  • Shuyao Wu

    (College of Geography and Remote Sensing, Hohai University, Nanjing 211000, China)

  • Tian Liang

    (School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Shandong University, Qingdao 266237, China
    Humanities Laboratory for the Theory and Mechanism Research on the Value Realizing of the Yellow River Ecosystem Products, Shandong University, Qingdao 266237, China)

  • Wenjie Cheng

    (Humanities Laboratory for the Theory and Mechanism Research on the Value Realizing of the Yellow River Ecosystem Products, Shandong University, Qingdao 266237, China
    Institute of Humanities and Arts, Shandong University, Qingdao 266237, China)

  • Dongsheng Shi

    (Shandong Academy of Environmental Sciences Co., Ltd., Jinan 250013, China)

  • Linbo Zhang

    (Humanities Laboratory for the Theory and Mechanism Research on the Value Realizing of the Yellow River Ecosystem Products, Shandong University, Qingdao 266237, China)

Abstract

Ecological compensation is an important policy tool for coordinating ecological protection and economic development and narrowing regional disparities. In China, Linyi, for the first time, applied a cap-and-trade policy to the forestry sector by implementing the Intergovernmental Forest Ecological Indicator Trading Policy (IFEITP)—a new ecological compensation policy—to increase the city’s overall forest coverage. However, the compensation standard for this policy was formulated solely by referring to provincial afforestation subsidy standards, resulting in excessively low indicator trading prices and making the policy difficult to sustain. This paper proposes a technical framework for ecological compensation based on the ecosystem service spillover value (ESSV), aiming to optimize the IFEITP. The results revealed that during the policy implementation period, Linyi’s total ecosystem service value (ESV) increased, and the proportion of ESV provided by forests in each district and county also increased. Under the new framework, there were minor changes in the ecosystem service supply zones and payment zones. The compensation received by supply zones increased by 116.2%, whereas the payments made by payment zones accounted for less than 0.2% of local fiscal revenue. The newly calculated indicator trading price under this framework not only reflects the value of ecosystem services but also remains within the acceptable range of government finances, demonstrating high operability and providing a basis for optimizing the IFEITP. This study offers broader insights for regions with similar ecological and socioeconomic conditions, enabling the application of analogous ecological compensation policies to maintain environmental justice and promote sustainable development.

Suggested Citation

  • Hao Wang & Yaofa Ren & Xiaoqing Chang & Shuyao Wu & Tian Liang & Wenjie Cheng & Dongsheng Shi & Linbo Zhang, 2026. "Optimizing Forest Ecosystem Service Compensation Using Spillover Analysis: Evidence from Linyi’s Indicator Trading Policy, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-22, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:2:p:643-:d:1835877
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/2/643/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/2/643/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:2:p:643-:d:1835877. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.