IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i2p616-d1835219.html

China’s Carbon Emissions Trading Scheme Improved the Land Surface Ecological Quality

Author

Listed:
  • Diwei Zheng

    (School of Management, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China)

  • Daxin Dong

    (Institute of Western China Economic Research, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu 611130, China)

Abstract

The previous studies have suggested that the cap-and-trade carbon emissions trading scheme (ETS) was effective in reducing greenhouse gas emissions and atmospheric pollution. Are there other environmental benefits of this policy? This research question remains unanswered in the literature. Our study reports that China’s carbon ETS significantly improved the land surface ecological quality (LSEQ). The study analyzes the data of 328 Chinese cities during 2005–2020. A difference-in-differences (DID) regression model is used for quantitative policy evaluation. The land surface ecological quality is measured by a synthetic indicator of the remote sensing ecological index (RSEI). There are three main findings. (1) On average, the carbon ETS improved the land surface ecological quality index by 0.0113, which contributed 51% of the ecological quality improvement in ETS-implementing regions in the post-policy period. The positive effect of the policy increased over time. (2) The implementation of the carbon ETS reduced pollution emissions, promoted green innovation, and expanded the share of land with natural vegetation coverage. These phenomena provide explanations for why the policy improved the land surface ecological quality. (3) The policy effect exhibited some heterogeneities contingent on local climatic conditions. The effect was stronger in regions with more precipitation, shorter sunlight duration, and higher temperature.

Suggested Citation

  • Diwei Zheng & Daxin Dong, 2026. "China’s Carbon Emissions Trading Scheme Improved the Land Surface Ecological Quality," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-23, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:2:p:616-:d:1835219
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/2/616/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/2/616/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:2:p:616-:d:1835219. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.