IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i2p594-d1834845.html

Design and Evaluation of a CO 2 Liquefaction and Liquid-Phase Compression System for Decarbonized Coal-Fired Power Plants

Author

Listed:
  • Luigi Fusco

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Via del Politecnico 1, 00133 Rome, Italy)

  • Marco Gambini

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Via del Politecnico 1, 00133 Rome, Italy)

  • Michele Manno

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Via del Politecnico 1, 00133 Rome, Italy)

  • Michela Vellini

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Via del Politecnico 1, 00133 Rome, Italy)

Abstract

This study investigates the energy performance and preliminary turbomachinery design of post-combustion CO 2 compression systems integrated into an ultra-supercritical coal-fired power plant with carbon capture and storage (CCS). To enable pipeline transport, CO 2 must be delivered at 150 bar and 15 °C, i.e., in liquid phase. Unlike conventional configurations that compress CO 2 entirely in the gaseous/supercritical phase before final cooling, two alternative layouts are proposed, introducing an intermediate liquefaction step prior to liquid-phase compression. Each layout uses a chiller system that operates at CO 2 condensation temperatures of 10 °C and 20 °C. The energy performance and the system layout architecture are evaluated and compared with the conventional gaseous-phase compression configuration. An in-depth sensitivity analysis, which varies the flow coefficient, the working coefficient, and the degree of reaction, confirms that the turbomachinery preliminary design, based on input parameters related to the specific speed, is a high-efficiency design. The results indicate that the 10 °C liquefaction layout requires the least compression power (60 MW), followed by the 20 °C layout (62.5 MW) and the conventional system (67 MW). Including the consumption of the chiller, the proposed systems require an additional power of 11–12 MW, compared to just over 1 MW for the conventional layout with simple CO 2 cooling. These results highlight the significant influence of the integration of the chiller on the overall power requirement of the system. Although the proposed configurations result in a larger equipment footprint, the integrated capture and compression/liquefaction system allows for very low CO 2 emissions, making the power plant more sustainable.

Suggested Citation

  • Luigi Fusco & Marco Gambini & Michele Manno & Michela Vellini, 2026. "Design and Evaluation of a CO 2 Liquefaction and Liquid-Phase Compression System for Decarbonized Coal-Fired Power Plants," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-26, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:2:p:594-:d:1834845
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/2/594/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/2/594/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:2:p:594-:d:1834845. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.