Author
Listed:
- Filippo Vigo
(Department of Environmental Science and Policy, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via G. Celoria 2, 20133 Milano, Italy)
- Luca Ferraro
(Department of Environmental Science and Policy, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via G. Celoria 2, 20133 Milano, Italy)
- Jacopo Bacenetti
(Department of Environmental Science and Policy, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via G. Celoria 2, 20133 Milano, Italy)
Abstract
Maize is a water-intensive crop widely cultivated in temperate regions, where irrigation practices strongly influence its environmental performance. This study applies Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) to compare the environmental impacts of surface and drip irrigation for maize green silage production in the Po Valley (Italy), following ISO 14040/44 standards and adopting a cradle-to-farm-gate perspective. Results show that, compared to drip irrigation, surface irrigation leads to lower impacts in 14 out of 15 categories, with reductions ranging from −0.2% (marine eutrophication) to −61% (human toxicity, non-cancer), particularly for human toxicity and resource use due to lower diesel and infrastructure requirements. Conversely, drip irrigation achieves a 58% reduction in water use thanks to its higher irrigation efficiency. The single-score assessment highlights water use as the key differentiating factor, positioning drip irrigation as preferable under scenarios of water scarcity. Contribution and sensitivity analyses confirm that nitrogen fertiliser use and mechanisation are major hotspots, while yield variation (±30%) significantly affects the magnitude of results. These findings emphasise a clear trade-off: surface irrigation shows a lower environmental burden across most impact categories, whereas drip irrigation strongly reduces water scarcity impacts and provides robust, site-specific evidence to guide sustainable irrigation strategies in intensive maize systems.
Suggested Citation
Filippo Vigo & Luca Ferraro & Jacopo Bacenetti, 2026.
"Surface and Drip Irrigation Method in Maize Cultivation: Comparison of Environmental Performance,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-17, January.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:2:p:580-:d:1834548
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:2:p:580-:d:1834548. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.