IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i2p567-d1834233.html

Evaluation of Ecological Restoration Effect on Abandoned Steep Bare Rock Mine Slopes: A Case Study of Abandoned High Steep Mine Slopes in Jiangsu Province

Author

Listed:
  • Yuhong Liang

    (Marine Geological Survey of Jiangsu Province, Nanjing 210007, China)

  • Xiaolong Zhang

    (School of Earth Sciences and Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China)

  • Yingjie Lin

    (Marine Geological Survey of Jiangsu Province, Nanjing 210007, China)

  • Hu Sun

    (Marine Geological Survey of Jiangsu Province, Nanjing 210007, China)

  • Menglong Dong

    (School of Earth Sciences and Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China)

  • Huaqing Zhang

    (School of Earth Sciences and Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China)

  • Fangyong Wang

    (Jiangsu Zhujiu Building Conservation & Technology Co., Ltd., Suzhou 215127, China)

  • Faming Zhang

    (School of Earth Sciences and Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China)

Abstract

Ecological restoration of abandoned mines with high and steep slopes is challenging due to their steepness, water scarcity, and lack of soil, and restoration effects vary with applied techniques. This study aims to assess the ecological restoration effectiveness of restored steep bare rock slopes in Jiangsu Province. The restoration status of steep bare rock slopes was assessed through field surveys, with corresponding methods for vegetation data collection and soil sample analysis subsequently selected. An evaluation system consisting of 14 evaluation indicators from 3 aspects was established using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Based on the on-site investigation results and test data, the evaluation criteria and evaluation intervals for the five evaluation levels of “optimum, excellent, good, medium, and poor” have been determined. After obtaining the weights of each indicator, the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) method is used to establish a normalized matrix of evaluation indicators, calculate the weighted decision matrix, and determine the ideal solution. The results showed that (1) the proportion of ecological restoration effects in the excellent–optimum, good–excellent, and medium–good was 30%, 43.3%, and 26.7%, respectively, which is consistent with the on-site investigation results; (2) the on-site investigation and evaluation results indicate that the ecological restoration effect of steep bare rock slopes is easily affected by the slope’s soil and water conservation capacity; (3) the weights of each indicator layer are slope ecosystem stability > vegetation > soil, with a maximum value of 0.443, indicating that ecosystem stability is the main factor affecting the ecological restoration effect of mines. This evaluation system is based on on-site investigations and indoor test results, and objectively and effectively evaluates the ecological restoration effect of steep bare rock slopes through qualitative evaluation and quantitative analysis. The methodology demonstrates high applicability and reliability for steep bare rock slopes, thereby serving as a valuable reference for selecting and evaluating the efficacy of ecological restoration technologies in similar environments.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuhong Liang & Xiaolong Zhang & Yingjie Lin & Hu Sun & Menglong Dong & Huaqing Zhang & Fangyong Wang & Faming Zhang, 2026. "Evaluation of Ecological Restoration Effect on Abandoned Steep Bare Rock Mine Slopes: A Case Study of Abandoned High Steep Mine Slopes in Jiangsu Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-26, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:2:p:567-:d:1834233
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/2/567/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/2/567/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:2:p:567-:d:1834233. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.