IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i2p1136-d1846522.html

Digital Siphoning and Resource Lock-In: The Distortion and Spatial Divergence of the Digital Economy’s Green Effects

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaodan Gao

    (School of Economics, Sichuan University of Science and Engineering, Yibin 644000, China
    Sichuan Key Provincial Research Base of Intelligent Tourism, Sichuan University of Science and Engineering, Yibin 644000, China)

  • Yinhui Wang

    (School of Economics and Business Administration, Yibin University, Yibin 644000, China)

  • Hu Li

    (School of Economics, Sichuan University of Science and Engineering, Yibin 644000, China
    Sichuan Key Provincial Research Base of Intelligent Tourism, Sichuan University of Science and Engineering, Yibin 644000, China)

Abstract

As digital technologies increasingly permeate urban governance and economic systems, the digital economy (DE) is widely regarded as a key driver of green urban transformation. However, its environmental effects remain complex under the dual constraints of resource dependence (RD) and spatial structure. Drawing on panel data from 277 Chinese prefecture-level cities from 2011 to 2019, this study systematically evaluates the green impacts of the DE across varying resource conditions and urban lifecycle stages. The results reveal a dual-effect pattern: while digitalization significantly promotes local green sustainable development (GSD), it simultaneously suppresses the green performance of neighboring cities through siphoning effects, creating spatial divergence. Cities with lower levels of RD are more likely to benefit from digital dividends, whereas in high-dependence settings, the green effects of digitalization reverse beyond a critical threshold. Grouped regressions for resource-based (RBCs) and non-resource-based cities (NRBCs) further confirm this moderating mechanism. Moreover, lifecycle heterogeneity among RBCs leads to differentiated green outcomes. By introducing the dual mechanisms of “resource lock-in” and “digital siphoning” into the framework of GSD, this study expands the theoretical understanding of the interaction between digitalization and RD. The findings provide empirical support for interpreting the structural divergence in DE–GSD linkages and offer a quantitative basis for differentiated policy strategies in resource-intensive urban contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaodan Gao & Yinhui Wang & Hu Li, 2026. "Digital Siphoning and Resource Lock-In: The Distortion and Spatial Divergence of the Digital Economy’s Green Effects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-24, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:2:p:1136-:d:1846522
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/2/1136/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/2/1136/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:2:p:1136-:d:1846522. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.