IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i2p1104-d1845877.html

Assessment of Psychological Effects of the Built Environment Based on TFN–Prospect–Regret Theory–VIKOR: A Case Study of Open-Plan Offices

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaoting Cheng

    (Art Academy, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China)

  • Guiling Zhao

    (Art Academy, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China)

  • Meng Xie

    (Art Academy, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China)

Abstract

As people spend more time indoors, the impact of the built environment on psychological health has attracted growing attention. Yet existing studies often have difficulty capturing decision-makers’ reference dependence and loss aversion under uncertainty. To bridge this gap, we propose an evaluation framework comprising three first-level criteria—Outdoor Environment, Physical Comfort (including thermal, lighting, and color environments), and Acoustic Comfort—and determine combined weights by integrating subjective analytic hierarchy process (AHP) judgments with objective entropy weighting based on triangular fuzzy numbers (TFNs). We further incorporate prospect–regret theory to represent loss aversion, expectation-based reference points, and counterfactual regret/rejoicing, and couple it with the VIKOR compromise ranking method, forming an integrated “TFN + Prospect–Regret + VIKOR” approach. The proposed method is applied to four retrofit alternatives for an open-plan office floor (approximately 1200 m 2 ), each emphasizing outdoor environment, physical comfort, acoustic comfort, or no single priority. Experts assessed the schemes using fuzzy linguistic variables. The results show that lighting conditions, thermal comfort, color scheme, and internal noise control receive the highest comprehensive weights. Extensive sensitivity analyses across value/weighting functions and regret-aversion parameters indicate that the ranking of alternatives remains stable while exhibiting clearer separation. Comparative analyses further suggest that, although the overall ordering is consistent with baseline methods, the proposed model increases score dispersion and improves discriminative power. Overall, by explicitly accounting for decision-makers’ psychological behavior and information uncertainty, the framework enables robust and interpretable selection of retrofit schemes for existing office spaces.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaoting Cheng & Guiling Zhao & Meng Xie, 2026. "Assessment of Psychological Effects of the Built Environment Based on TFN–Prospect–Regret Theory–VIKOR: A Case Study of Open-Plan Offices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-26, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:2:p:1104-:d:1845877
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/2/1104/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/2/1104/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:2:p:1104-:d:1845877. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.