IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i2p1060-d1844869.html

Longitudinal Mobility and Temporal Use Patterns in Urban Parks: Multi-Year Evidence from the City of Las Vegas, 2018–2022

Author

Listed:
  • Shuqi Hu

    (Department of Landscape Architecture, Rhode Island School of Design, Providence, RI 02903, USA)

  • Zheng Zhu

    (Department of Landscape Architecture, Rhode Island School of Design, Providence, RI 02903, USA)

  • Pai Liu

    (School of Architecture and Fine Arts, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China)

Abstract

Urban parks are central to public health and equity, yet less is known about how park travel distance, park “attractor” types, and time-of-day visitation rhythms co-evolved through and after the COVID-19 pandemic. Using anonymized smartphone mobility traces for public parks in Las Vegas, USA (2018–2022), we construct weekly origin–destination flows between census block groups (CBGs) and parks and link origins to socio-economic indicators. We first estimate visitor-weighted mean travel distance with a segmented time-series model that allows pandemic-related breakpoints. Results show that average park-trip distance (≈8.4 km pre-pandemic), including a substantial share of long-distance trips (≈52% of visits), contracted sharply at the onset of COVID-19, and that both travel radii and seasonal excursion peaks only partially rebounded by 2022. Next, cross-sectional OLS/WLS models (R 2 ≈ 0.08–0.14) indicate persistent socio-spatial disparities: CBGs with higher educational attainment and larger shares of Black and Hispanic residents are consistently associated with shorter park-trip distances, suggesting constrained recreational mobility for socially disadvantaged groups. We then identify a stable two-type park typology—local versus regional attractors—using clustering on origin diversity and long-distance share (silhouette ≈ 0.46–0.52); this typology is strongly related to visitation volume and temporal usage profiles. Finally, mixed-effects models of evening and late-night visit shares show that regional attractors sustain higher nighttime activity than local parks, even as citywide evening/late-night visitation dipped during the mid-pandemic period and only partly recovered thereafter. Overall, our findings reveal a durable post-pandemic re-scaling of park use toward more proximate, CBG-embedded patterns layered on enduring inequities in access to distant, destination-oriented parks. These insights offer actionable evidence for equitable park planning, targeted investment in high-need areas, and time-sensitive management strategies that account for daytime versus nighttime use.

Suggested Citation

  • Shuqi Hu & Zheng Zhu & Pai Liu, 2026. "Longitudinal Mobility and Temporal Use Patterns in Urban Parks: Multi-Year Evidence from the City of Las Vegas, 2018–2022," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-31, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:2:p:1060-:d:1844869
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/2/1060/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/2/1060/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:2:p:1060-:d:1844869. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.