Author
Listed:
- Brent Damian Jammer
(Department of Agricultural Economics, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein 9300, South Africa)
- Willem Abraham Lombard
(Department of Agricultural Economics, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein 9300, South Africa)
- Henry Jordaan
(Department of Agricultural Economics, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein 9300, South Africa)
Abstract
Weaning age is a critical management decision in beef cattle production, influencing herd productivity, financial outcomes, and overall system sustainability. Commonly practiced in South African beef systems, is where calves are weaned at 6–9 months (conventional weaning), while early weaning (EW) at approximately 90 days remains underutilized. This study presents a farm case study and preliminary financial assessment of EW and CW using a farm calculation model incorporating revenue, weaning costs, supplementation, and labor. Data from 152 Bonsmara cow–calf pairs were analyzed. CW calves achieved higher weaning weights (237 kg) and average daily gains (992 g/day) than EW calves (210 kg; 889 g/day), generating greater revenue (R630,420 vs. R558,600). The Pearson Chi-square test showed an association between weaning system and dam reproductive performance, with EW cows achieving a 94% pregnancy rate compared to 84% under CW. Although CW produced higher short-term gross margins (R6446 per system vs. R3068 for EW), sensitivity analyses indicated that EW becomes financially competitive when price premiums are applied. Simulations showed that an EW price range of R34–R40/kg could yield higher returns despite lower weights. These findings demonstrate that EW, when supported by structured price incentives, can enhance reproductive efficiency and contribute to more sustainable and financially resilient beef production systems in South Africa.
Suggested Citation
Brent Damian Jammer & Willem Abraham Lombard & Henry Jordaan, 2026.
"A Farm-Level Case Study Evaluating the Financial Performance of Early vs. Conventional Calf Weaning Practices in South African Beef Production Systems,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-20, January.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:2:p:1044-:d:1844644
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:2:p:1044-:d:1844644. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.