Author
Listed:
- Maneesh Kumar Mediboyina
(UCD School of Biosystems and Food Engineering, University College Dublin, Belfield, D04 N2E5 Dublin, Ireland
BiOrbic Bioeconomy SFI Research Centre, University College Dublin, Belfield, D04 N2E5 Dublin, Ireland)
- Nishtha Talwar
(UCD School of Biosystems and Food Engineering, University College Dublin, Belfield, D04 N2E5 Dublin, Ireland
BiOrbic Bioeconomy SFI Research Centre, University College Dublin, Belfield, D04 N2E5 Dublin, Ireland)
- Fionnuala Murphy
(UCD School of Biosystems and Food Engineering, University College Dublin, Belfield, D04 N2E5 Dublin, Ireland
BiOrbic Bioeconomy SFI Research Centre, University College Dublin, Belfield, D04 N2E5 Dublin, Ireland)
Abstract
This study evaluates the environmental outcomes of integrating anaerobic digestion (AD) with pyrolysis (Py) and hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) to treat cattle slurry and grass silage in an Irish agricultural context. A consequential life cycle assessment (CLCA) was carried out for six scenarios based on 1 t of feedstock (0.4:0.6 cattle slurry/grass silage on a VS basis): two standalone AD systems (producing bioelectricity and biomethane) and four integrated AD–Py/HTC systems with different product utilisation pathways. Across all impact categories, the integrated systems performed better than standalone AD. This improvement is mainly due to the surplus bioenergy (electricity, biomethane, hydrocarbon fuel, hydrochar) that replaces marginal fossil energy (hard coal, natural gas and heavy fuel oil), together with the displacement of mineral NPK fertilisers by digestate-derived biochar and HTC process water. Among the configurations, the AD–HTC bioelectricity scenario (S4) achieved the best overall performance, driven by higher hydrochar yields, a favourable heating value, and a lower pretreatment energy demand compared with Py-based options. Across the integrated scenarios, climate change, freshwater eutrophication, and fossil depletion impacts were reduced by up to 84%, 86%, and 99%, respectively, relative to the fossil-based reference system, while avoiding digestate and fertiliser application reduced terrestrial acidification by up to 74%. Overall, the results show that the cascading utilisation of digestate via AD–Py/HTC can simultaneously enhance bioenergy production and nutrient recycling, providing a robust pathway for low-emission management of agricultural residues. These findings are directly relevant to Ireland’s renewable energy and circular economy targets and are transferable to other livestock-intensive regions seeking to valorise slurry and grass-based residues as low-carbon energy and biofertiliser resources.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:2:p:1040-:d:1844476. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.