IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i2p1025-d1844015.html

Market Structure and Green Innovation Response to Carbon Pricing: Evidence from the EU Electricity Market

Author

Listed:
  • Hao Wang

    (Faculty of Economics, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand)

  • Woraphon Yamaka

    (Faculty of Economics, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand)

  • Tin Maw Maw Tun

    (Faculty of Economics, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand)

Abstract

This study examines how national electricity market structures condition the impact of carbon pricing on green innovation within the European Union. Using two-way fixed-effects panel models, we uncover a central paradox: although liberalized, price-signal markets exhibit the highest baseline levels of green innovation, the marginal effect of carbon pricing in these markets is weakest and often negative. This pattern points to an innovation-substitution effect, whereby market flexibility facilitates short-term compliance strategies, such as fuel switching, that crowd out investment in fundamental research and development (R&D) when carbon prices remain moderate. By identifying this mechanism, the study establishes electricity market structure as a pivotal moderating factor in the carbon pricing–innovation nexus and highlights a critical boundary condition for the Porter Hypothesis. The findings provide important insights for the design of sustainability policy mixes, demonstrating that institutional context plays a decisive role in translating economic instruments into sustained technological change. Effective climate policy therefore cannot be context-blind; instead, it must combine carbon pricing with tailored market design and direct support for long-term R&D to coherently advance the sustainability transition.

Suggested Citation

  • Hao Wang & Woraphon Yamaka & Tin Maw Maw Tun, 2026. "Market Structure and Green Innovation Response to Carbon Pricing: Evidence from the EU Electricity Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-25, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:2:p:1025-:d:1844015
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/2/1025/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/2/1025/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:2:p:1025-:d:1844015. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.