IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i2p1007-d1843754.html

Advancing River Health Assessment: An Integrated ISC Methodology Applied to Taiwan’s River Restoration Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Ching-Feng Chen

    (Department of Civil Engineering, National Taipei University of Technology, Taipei 10608, Taiwan)

  • Shih-Kai Chen

    (Department of Civil Engineering, National Taipei University of Technology, Taipei 10608, Taiwan)

Abstract

River health assessment frameworks play a critical role in guiding restoration planning and watershed management, yet conventional index-based approaches often rely on fixed weighting schemes that limit diagnostic sensitivity and interpretability. This study proposes an integrated assessment framework that enhances the traditional Index of Stream Condition (ISC) by incorporating data-driven structural information while preserving transparency and regulatory relevance. Rather than replacing existing indices, the framework recalibrates sub-index contributions based on intrinsic data patterns derived from nonlinear embedding and density-based clustering. The proposed methodology is applied to the Zhuoshui River basin in Taiwan to demonstrate its capability to improve internal consistency, reduce metric redundancy, and clarify dominant environmental drivers. Results indicate that the recalibrated index provides clearer differentiation among ecological conditions and improves explanatory consistency compared with the original ISC formulation. By balancing methodological innovation with interpretability, the proposed framework offers a practical pathway for strengthening river health assessment and supporting restoration-oriented decision-making.

Suggested Citation

  • Ching-Feng Chen & Shih-Kai Chen, 2026. "Advancing River Health Assessment: An Integrated ISC Methodology Applied to Taiwan’s River Restoration Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-22, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:2:p:1007-:d:1843754
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/2/1007/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/2/1007/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:2:p:1007-:d:1843754. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.