IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i1p524-d1833296.html

A Framework for Mitigating Greenwashing in Sustainability Reporting

Author

Listed:
  • Agne Sneideriene

    (Faculty of Economics and Management, Vytautas Magnus University, 44248 Kaunas, Lithuania)

  • Renata Legenzova

    (Faculty of Economics and Management, Vytautas Magnus University, 44248 Kaunas, Lithuania)

Abstract

Greenwashing in environmental, social, and governance reporting poses a significant threat to corporate accountability and stakeholder trust. This article provides a comprehensive synthesis of existing research to evaluate the role and effectiveness of sustainability assurance as a primary mechanism to combat greenwashing and proposes a framework for it. Based on a systematic literature review, this paper consolidates empirical findings indicating that sustainability assurance has a significant inhibitory effect on corporate greenwashing and is positively valued by capital markets, as evidenced by lower equity capital costs. However, the analysis also reveals that the effectiveness of assurance is not uniform; it is moderated by contextual factors such as the strength of the national legal environment and, in particular, regulatory environments, which can be exploited to legitimize overstated disclosures. This paper proposes a conceptual framework for anti-greenwashing assurance that integrates five interconnected pillars (regulatory, stakeholder engagement, third-party verification, corporate culture and internal controls, and technologies), forming a synergistic ecosystem of deterrents which collectively shape the integrity and credibility of sustainability reporting practices. To enhance the effectiveness of greenwashing mitigation, the proposed framework must be further strengthened by integrating the core principles of transparency, materiality, and verifiability across all its pillars.

Suggested Citation

  • Agne Sneideriene & Renata Legenzova, 2026. "A Framework for Mitigating Greenwashing in Sustainability Reporting," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-21, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:1:p:524-:d:1833296
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/1/524/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/1/524/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:1:p:524-:d:1833296. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.