IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i1p472-d1832037.html

Sword or Futility? Blockchain-Based Competition in Refurbished Market Considering Consumer Reference Behaviors

Author

Listed:
  • Deqing Ma

    (School of Business, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266071, China)

  • Haoyu Yin

    (School of Business, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266071, China)

  • Jinsong Hu

    (School of Business, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266071, China)

  • Wei Li

    (Quality Control Department, Shandong LuShangTong Technology Co., Ltd., Jinan 250013, China)

Abstract

In addition to competition from independent refurbishers, consumer distrust of refurbished product quality is a major bottleneck for brand manufacturers when selling refurbished products. This paper focuses on a duopoly competition consisting of a brand manufacturer and an independent refurbisher. Considering the direct and indirect reference quality effects triggered by consumers’ reference quality behavior in such an environment and their interaction with consumers’ prevalent reference price behavior, this paper explores the effectiveness of manufacturers’ responses to quality disclosure using blockchain and its impact on the competition in the refurbished market. The results show that when the market competitiveness increased by blockchain is high enough, it increases competition in the quality dimension by facilitating the brand manufacturer to improve the quality of the original product but reduces competition in the price dimension through the brand premium effect. When the degree of refurbishment by the brand manufacturer is high and the direct reference quality effect is large, the implementation of the blockchain manifests itself as an advertising effect that expands the market size but fails to combat the independent refurbisher. Conversely, when the brand manufacturer has a low degree of refurbishment and the direct reference quality effect is dominant, the adoption of blockchain can be used as a competitive tool for the brand manufacturer to combat the independent refurbisher in the refurbishment market. For consumers, the application of blockchain may not necessarily result in a more cost-effective refurbished product. Furthermore, whether consumer surplus and social welfare can be improved after the implementation of blockchain depends on the degree of refurbishment by the brand manufacturer and the reference quality effect.

Suggested Citation

  • Deqing Ma & Haoyu Yin & Jinsong Hu & Wei Li, 2026. "Sword or Futility? Blockchain-Based Competition in Refurbished Market Considering Consumer Reference Behaviors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-48, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:1:p:472-:d:1832037
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/1/472/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/1/472/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:1:p:472-:d:1832037. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.