Author
Listed:
- Huizhuan Wang
(College of Environmental and Resource Sciences, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China)
- Minggang Zhang
(Institute of Loess Plateau, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China)
- Fang Li
(College of Environmental and Resource Sciences, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China)
- Guofang Chen
(Shanxi Third Geological Engineering Exploration Institute Co., Ltd., Jinzhong 030600, China)
- Yanqing Yang
(College of Environmental and Resource Sciences, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China)
- Guoqing Li
(College of Environmental and Resource Sciences, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China)
- Yonggang Yang
(College of Environmental and Resource Sciences, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China)
Abstract
Traditional evaluations of ecological restoration in mining lands have long been dominated by above ground vegetation metrics, such as coverage and community diversity. Yet in arid and semi-arid mining regions, soil hydrology recovery is key, as soil organic carbon (SOC) and bulk density (BD) are critical factors affecting soil hydrology. However, their thresholds for water holding capacity and infiltration remain unclear. Therefore, this study determined the SOC and BD thresholds and evaluated the hydrological trends across them. The study was in a Loess Plateau coal reclamation area. Five restoration types and one reference forest were selected, and soil samples were collected from the 0–10 cm layer. Redundancy analysis (RDA), partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS–SEM), and the threshold regression model were used for analysis. Results show the following: (1) Vegetation indirectly controls soil hydrology via soil structure and chemical properties (RDA: 76.04%). BD limited water holding capacity (path coefficient: −0.908), while chemical properties promoted infiltration (path coefficient: 0.397). (2) Soil hydrological recovery exhibits non-linear threshold responses. The SOC thresholds for water holding capacity and infiltration were 9.52 g/kg and 5.93 g/kg, respectively, while the BD thresholds were 0.93 g/cm 3 and 1.03 g/cm 3 . The reclamation of soil hydrological functions in mining lands follows a two-stage mechanism. First, control by carbon accumulation, then follow by structural dominance. During the early stage, soil organic carbon (SOC) buildup quickly boosts hydrological performance by promoting aggregate formation. However, once the system nears its functional threshold, simply adding more carbon gives limited returns. At this stage, breaking through physical constraints becomes vital to overcoming the bottleneck. Above-ground metrics alone cannot capture below-ground ecosystem functional trajectories. Consequently, a dynamic strategy centered on SOC and BD is proposed.
Suggested Citation
Huizhuan Wang & Minggang Zhang & Fang Li & Guofang Chen & Yanqing Yang & Guoqing Li & Yonggang Yang, 2026.
"Soil Hydrological Functions and Threshold Effects Under Different Modes of Vegetation Restoration in a Reclaimed Coal Mine of the Loess Plateau,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-16, August.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:17:p:8733-:d:2024917
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:17:p:8733-:d:2024917. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.