Beyond the Ranking Paradox: A Context-Weighted Liveability Index for Assessing Mediterranean Smart Cities—A Proof-of-Concept GIS-Based Comparison of Bologna and Athens

Conventional international rankings assess urban efficiency via context-blind metrics, a design that the literature suggests may structurally disadvantage Mediterranean centres and obscure the sustainable policy pathways mandated by the Sustainable Development Goals, most notably the governance of urban transitions under SDG 11. This paper proposes the Context-Weighted Liveability Index (CWLI), which introduces context-sensitive weights into the aggregation of standard smart city KPIs, bridging the global comparability of IMD-style indices with the Mediterranean-specific assessment logic of the ASCIMER framework. Weights derive from five geographic coefficients—climate, culture, economy, historical density, and demography—through a transparent weighted additive formulation with an explicit sensitivity matrix, whose robustness is verified through Monte Carlo uncertainty analysis over 5000 perturbed configurations spanning parameters, coefficients, measurements and benchmarks. Coefficients and KPIs are computed from open spatial data through a replicable GIS protocol (QGIS; OpenStreetMap, Copernicus land cover and land surface temperature, and ISTAT/ELSTAT census data at sub-municipal scale). Applied comparatively to Bologna and Athens, the framework shows that contextual weighting concentrates over 60% of the total weight on climate-sensitive indicators and yields, through the decomposition of contributions, a policy diagnosis that differs from the one suggested by reading an overall smart city rank in isolation: Athens’ largest contribution is digital and its liveability deficit territorial—a profile with direct consequences for sustainable urban transition and talent attraction. Implications for SDG 11 monitoring, equitable access to urban green space, and digital twin integration are discussed.