Author
Listed:
- Diego de Freitas Espinoza
(Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Accounting at Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo (FEA-RP/USP), Ribeirão Preto 14040-905, SP, Brazil)
- Perla Calil Pongeluppe Wadhy Rebehy
(Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Accounting at Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo (FEA-RP/USP), Ribeirão Preto 14040-905, SP, Brazil)
- Alexandre Pereira Salgado Junior
(Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Accounting at Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo (FEA-RP/USP), Ribeirão Preto 14040-905, SP, Brazil)
- Milton Barossi Filho
(Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Accounting at Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo (FEA-RP/USP), Ribeirão Preto 14040-905, SP, Brazil)
- Vinícius Ricardo Ferreira Janick
(Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Accounting at Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo (FEA-RP/USP), Ribeirão Preto 14040-905, SP, Brazil)
- Juliana Chiaretti Novi
(Ribeirão Preto University (UNAERP), Ribeirão Preto 14096-900, SP, Brazil)
Abstract
The successful implementation of Brazil’s National Solid Waste Plan depends on identifying municipal solid waste management strategies that are both environmentally effective and fiscally realistic for replication at scale. This study develops and tests a multidimensional framework that evaluates the performance of Brazilian municipalities across five indicators: environmental recovery quality (Y1), social coverage (Y2), economic cost efficiency (Y3), and two cost-composite indicators (Y4, Y5). The framework is grounded in the recognition that municipal solid waste management involves significant market failures—natural monopoly conditions on the supply side, and negative externalities from improper disposal alongside positive externalities from material recovery—which make single-dimension cost minimization an insufficient performance criterion. Using multivariate regression analysis on a sample of 394 municipalities drawn from the National Sanitation Information System, the study identifies factors associated with performance across all five dimensions and finds that cross-indicator sign reversals are consistent with the presence of misaligned incentives: logistical decisions and contractual structures that appear efficient at the service level generate costs in the recovery chain that are not internalized by operators. Municipalities were stratified into five recovery bands (A–E); those in Bands B–D perform significantly above the national average in material recovery while achieving cost–benefit indicators realistic enough for broader replication, making them the most strategically relevant reference group for national policy learning. The findings suggest that performance improvements are more strongly associated with the quality and targeting of expenditure than with aggregate spending levels, and that incentive-aligned contracts, quality-preserving logistics, and structured inclusion of organized waste pickers represent complementary instruments for internalizing the social value of material recovery. These results offer a foundation for evidence-based policy design under the National Solid Waste Policy frameworks.
Suggested Citation
Diego de Freitas Espinoza & Perla Calil Pongeluppe Wadhy Rebehy & Alexandre Pereira Salgado Junior & Milton Barossi Filho & Vinícius Ricardo Ferreira Janick & Juliana Chiaretti Novi, 2026.
"Externalities and Misaligned Incentives in Sustainable Solid Waste Management: An Economic Theory Perspective for Policy Design in Brazil,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-22, August.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:16:p:8296-:d:2014530
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:16:p:8296-:d:2014530. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.