IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i15p7775-d2004652.html

Multi-Scenario Simulation and Driving Factor Analysis of Carbon Storage Based on PLUS-InVEST and XGBoost-SHAP Models: A Study from Weihe River Basin, China

Author

Listed:
  • Jie Chen

    (School of Architecture and Surveying Engineering, Shanxi Datong University, Datong 037003, China)

  • Yi Hou

    (School of Coal Engineering, Shanxi Datong University, Datong 037003, China)

  • Jianhua Ni

    (School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Anhui University, Hefei 230601, China)

  • Pengxiang Gao

    (School of Architecture and Surveying Engineering, Shanxi Datong University, Datong 037003, China)

  • Jianhua Xue

    (School of Architecture and Surveying Engineering, Shanxi Datong University, Datong 037003, China)

Abstract

Against China’s dual-carbon strategy and watershed ecological high-quality development initiatives, exploring land-use-driven carbon storage variations is crucial for watershed spatial governance, ecological restoration and carbon sink improvement. As the Yellow River’s largest tributary, the Weihe River Basin straddles the ecotone of arid–semiarid Northwest China and the eastern monsoon region, with fragile ecosystems, intense human activities and dramatic land-use evolution. Clarifying its spatiotemporal carbon dynamics and nonlinear factor response patterns can support low-carbon ecological regulation and coordinated watershed sustainability. This study integrates PLUS and InVEST models to quantify the spatiotemporal patterns of land use and carbon storage across 2000–2020 land use data. Four development scenarios are established to predict 2030 carbon storage spatial heterogeneity, and an interpretable XGBoost-SHAP framework was employed to disentangle the nonlinear responses of carbon storage to natural and socioeconomic drivers. The results show that basin carbon storage exhibited an overall increasing trend, with a net increase of 452.29 × 10 4 t over the 2 decades. Spatially, high-carbon areas presented patchy aggregation in the northeast, sporadic distribution in the west and zonal expansion in the south–central basin, while low-carbon areas were concentrated in the downstream Guanzhong Plain urban agglomeration. Land-use transitions represented a major source of regional carbon variability, with forest expansion driven by the Grain-for-Green Program generating the largest carbon sequestration increments. The 2030 scenario simulations revealed elevated carbon storage under natural development, cropland protection, and ecological protection scenarios, with the ecological protection scenario yielding the most prominent carbon gain. Conversely, unconstrained economic expansion coincided with prominent carbon storage declines, which implies that targeted ecological conservation and restoration could help alleviate carbon depletion across the watershed. NDVI, slope, and population density are the primary determinants of carbon storage, exhibiting typical staged nonlinear influencing effects. This study provides reliable scientific references for refined ecological restoration, spatial optimization, and carbon sink enhancement in ecologically fragile river basins.

Suggested Citation

  • Jie Chen & Yi Hou & Jianhua Ni & Pengxiang Gao & Jianhua Xue, 2026. "Multi-Scenario Simulation and Driving Factor Analysis of Carbon Storage Based on PLUS-InVEST and XGBoost-SHAP Models: A Study from Weihe River Basin, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-31, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:15:p:7775-:d:2004652
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/15/7775/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/15/7775/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:15:p:7775-:d:2004652. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.