Author
Listed:
- Jiaojiao Han
(College of Economics and Management, Baoji University of Arts and Sciences, Baoji 721013, China)
- Yan Zhong
(College of Economics and Management, Baoji University of Arts and Sciences, Baoji 721013, China)
- Xiaoyun Zhao
(College of Economics and Management, Baoji University of Arts and Sciences, Baoji 721013, China)
- Yan Zeng
(College of Economics and Management, Baoji University of Arts and Sciences, Baoji 721013, China)
- Ziying Sun
(College of Economics and Management, Baoji University of Arts and Sciences, Baoji 721013, China)
Abstract
Against the backdrop of China’s “Carbon Peaking and Carbon Neutrality” goal, the steel industry faces mounting pressure to improve its environmental accounting information disclosure as part of its green and low-carbon transition. This study evaluates the quality of environmental accounting disclosure among 30 listed Chinese steel companies from 2019 to 2023, using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and content analysis across disclosure channels and content dimensions. Three key findings are revealed: (1) Annual reports remain the dominant disclosure channel, while the share of standalone environmental reports rises from 3.33% to 53.33% but remains low and inconsistent. (2) Disclosure exhibits a pattern of “strong hard indicators but weak soft indicators and excessive positive information but scarce negative information”; environmental liability carries the highest weight (0.3083); and the quantitative disclosure of industrial solid waste and other specific metrics remains below 30%. (3) A weight-driven stratification pattern exists: high-weight hard indicators have improved under policy and market pressure, whereas low-weight soft indicators and negative information remain largely neglected. Based on these findings, this study proposes optimization paths from institutional norms, corporate governance, and external supervision. The conclusions provide practical implications for enhancing disclosure quality and supporting the green transformation of the steel industry under the “Carbon Peaking and Carbon Neutrality” strategy.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:15:p:7596-:d:2000239. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.