IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i14p7297-d1992902.html

Construction Education Alignment with Industry Skills Demands: A Data-Driven Evaluation Using Sampled Evidence in Australia

Author

Listed:
  • Anjuhan Saravana

    (School of Built Environment, University of New South Wales, High Street, Kensington, NSW 2052, Australia)

  • Sara Shirowzhan

    (School of Built Environment, University of New South Wales, High Street, Kensington, NSW 2052, Australia)

  • Faham Tahmasebinia

    (School of Civil Engineering, University of Sydney, City Road, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia)

  • Samad M. E. Sepasgozar

    (School of Built Environment, University of New South Wales, High Street, Kensington, NSW 2052, Australia)

Abstract

The Australian construction industry is currently navigating a productivity challenge in which workforce skills shortages represent a contributing factor. Historically, attempts to quantify this deficit have relied upon subjective surveys or ethically complex data collection methodologies, lacking the objective scale required for policy reform. To bridge this methodological gap and contribute to the literature with a current skills alignment analysis, this research introduces a natural language processing (utilising SBERT)-driven computational approach to explore the alignment between industry demand and educational supply. A sample of 3468 industry job advertisements from 2016 to 2018 and in 2026 were mapped against a weighted national educational supply vector (72.5% Vocational Education and Training, 27.5% Higher Education) using the standardised Australian Skills Classification taxonomy. The analysis indicates that curriculum–industry misalignment is a potential structural contributor to the skills gap in the sampled construction skills gap. Cosine similarity and Spearman’s rank analyses exposed a misalignment of skills priority by academia (ρ top20 = 0.32 and ρ global = 0.43). While the education sector dedicates nearly 90% of its combined curriculum to specialist tasks skills, these skills showed a misalignment (60%) with rapidly shifting industry demands. Furthermore, while explicit demand for technology tools skills remained stagnant, a misalignment (54%) quantitatively reflects the documented industry concerns regarding digital readiness caused by a lag in digital-skills training. Ultimately, this study contributes a data-driven methodology and a current skills gap analysis that enables educational policymakers to conduct agile, computation-driven curriculum audits. This supports more frequent and evidence-informed curriculum review in response to the evolving Australian construction industry skill demands.

Suggested Citation

  • Anjuhan Saravana & Sara Shirowzhan & Faham Tahmasebinia & Samad M. E. Sepasgozar, 2026. "Construction Education Alignment with Industry Skills Demands: A Data-Driven Evaluation Using Sampled Evidence in Australia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-46, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:14:p:7297-:d:1992902
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/14/7297/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/14/7297/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:14:p:7297-:d:1992902. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.