IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i14p7272-d1992520.html

Ecological Security Assessment and Multi-Scenario Early Warning in Black Soil Basins Based on the MESI–XGBoost–BN Integrated Framework

Author

Listed:
  • Na Miya

    (School of Environment, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China
    State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Wetland Ecology and Vegetation Restoration, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China
    Key Laboratory of Vegetation Ecology, Ministry of Education, Changchun 130024, China)

  • Zhijun Tong

    (School of Environment, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China
    State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Wetland Ecology and Vegetation Restoration, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China
    Key Laboratory of Vegetation Ecology, Ministry of Education, Changchun 130024, China)

  • A Senna

    (School of Environment, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China
    State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Wetland Ecology and Vegetation Restoration, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China
    Key Laboratory of Vegetation Ecology, Ministry of Education, Changchun 130024, China)

  • Xingpeng Liu

    (School of Environment, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China
    State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Wetland Ecology and Vegetation Restoration, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China
    Key Laboratory of Vegetation Ecology, Ministry of Education, Changchun 130024, China)

  • Jiquan Zhang

    (School of Environment, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China
    State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Wetland Ecology and Vegetation Restoration, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China
    Key Laboratory of Vegetation Ecology, Ministry of Education, Changchun 130024, China)

Abstract

Black soil degradation poses critical threats to agricultural sustainability and global food security, yet systematic frameworks integrating ecological security assessment, driver identification, and forward-looking early warning remain underdeveloped for black soil watersheds. This study develops and implements a comprehensive assessment–interpretation–early warning framework for the Xingkai Lake Basin, a representative black soil region at the China–Russia border. We developed a multivariate ecological security index (MESI) to describe the spatiotemporal dynamics between 2000 and 2023. An XGBoost–SHAP framework was applied to quantify dominant drivers of ecological security spatial heterogeneity and examine synergistic effects among driving factors through geographical detector interaction analysis. A Bayesian network model was subsequently employed to simulate the probability of warning grade occurrence under multiple univariate and multivariate scenarios. Findings revealed the following: (1) Spatial analysis revealed persistent north–south differentiation, with high spatial association zones contracting from 25% to 21% despite strengthened global spatial auto correlation. (2) XGBoost–SHAP driver analysis quantified that land use intensity and landscape fragmentation collectively explained over 75% of spatial heterogeneity in MESI. (3) BN models demonstrated greater sensitivity in simulating no warning and severe warning levels. This study provides scientifically rigorous insights into the sustainable management of ecosystems in black soil river basins and offers a generalizable decision-support framework for conducting ecological safety early warning research in other regions facing similar agricultural pressures.

Suggested Citation

  • Na Miya & Zhijun Tong & A Senna & Xingpeng Liu & Jiquan Zhang, 2026. "Ecological Security Assessment and Multi-Scenario Early Warning in Black Soil Basins Based on the MESI–XGBoost–BN Integrated Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-27, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:14:p:7272-:d:1992520
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/14/7272/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/14/7272/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:14:p:7272-:d:1992520. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.