Author
Listed:
- Jasmina Starc
(Department of Communication and Human Resource Management, Faculty of Economics and Informatics, University of Novo Mesto, Na Loko 2, 8000 Novo Mesto, Slovenia)
- Aleksandar Šobot
(Department of Environmental Management, Faculty of Economics and Informatics, University of Novo Mesto, Na Loko 2, 8000 Novo Mesto, Slovenia)
- Diana Bilić-Šobot
(Pivka Perutninarstvo d.d., Kal 1, 6257 Pivka, Slovenia)
Abstract
Green office practices are increasingly relevant to organizational sustainability, yet evidence remains dispersed across Green Human Resource Management (Green HRM), employee green behaviour, workplace design, environmental management, and indoor environmental quality. This systematic review synthesizes empirical evidence on green office practices in office-based organizational settings. Following PRISMA 2020, searches were conducted in Web of Science Core Collection and Scopus, supplemented by ScienceDirect, Emerald Insight, PubMed, and Google Scholar. In total, 594 records were identified; 22 empirical studies met the inclusion criteria and were thematically synthesized. Quality appraisal showed that all included studies provided sufficient empirical and thematic support, but the evidence base was dominated by cross-sectional and self-reported designs, limiting causal interpretation. The review addresses a gap in syntheses of Green HRM and employee green behaviour by examining the green office as a workplace-level setting where environmental management, people-management systems, workplace conditions, and everyday routines intersect. Findings show that green office practices are effective when supported by governance, Green HRM, leadership, culture, and employee participation. Employee green behaviour emerges as the mechanism translating environmental intentions into daily routines. Office-based organizations should connect green office measures with clear responsibilities, Green HRM routines, participation, and measurable resource-use indicators rather than treating them as stand-alone campaigns.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:14:p:7235-:d:1991829. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.